About Me

Name: Jack Cruger
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

What?? Obama's Afghan Soultion

My Wife and I were watching the President’s speech on 12/02/2009 and when he finished we both said, almost at the same time is this guy stupid or did we miss something.

I wouldn’t want the President to be my coach of the football team I was playing on because what he did was to give the Taliban and the al Qaeda our play book which we are going to use against them. There are many things wrong with this approach, which by the way was use before in Vietnam. The main purpose of  his so called surge is to train the Afghan’s national and local security forces so he can get the US forces out of there starting in 1011. Not once did he say that he wanted to WIN.

If I were one of the Taliban leaders, since Obama set a withdrawal date, I would pull back on any offensive actions and just wait for the US and Afghan forces to find us. Then I would put up enough of a fight to make it look like a real fight I would have some of the foreign insurgents try to overrun some US camps and be killed giving the impression of a US victory. In the mean time, over the eighteen months, I would build up our strength.

Obama said they would try to flip some of the Taliban fighters and have them join the Afghan forces. Believe me when I say the Taliban would readily take them up on that offer, there are most likely more Taliban in there than he wants, and who are understanding the Afghan forces strengths and weaknesses waiting for the right time to strike.

After the US forces leave the country, thinking they have won, the Taliban in-beds will turn on the Afghan forces and at the same time Taliban fighters will hit the Afghan Capital with everything they have.

Obama lays a lot of his success on the fact that Pakistani forces are going to employ a surge of their own against the Taliban and al Qaeda regrouping and training centers in Pakistan. So what is plan “B” if there is a radical coup, take over of the Pakistani Government? This is certainly very probable, since much of the Pakistani population sympathies and backs the Taliban with money and manpower. Obama’s short history shows that he does not consider the unintended consequences of his actions.

There are many, many things that could happen, which any commonsense person could conger up. The question here is there any commonsense in the Obama Admistration or are they just working and planning based on the political consequences?

Winning a war is based on true leadership and in our country the President must be willing to win if he decides to fight. Obama is not. He is worried about the cost, but will he pull the plug on Obama-care, or Cap & Trade. Will he relieve the taxes on business of all sizes and individuals of all pay grades and let the economy take hold creating jobs, which will provide the much needed funds?? We shall see. I hope this will not be the Obama Vietnam and that our troops will not get caught up in it. “God Bless Them.”          

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ANGELS VS. DEVILS AN OBAMA EXPOSE`

 
 

OBAMA EXPOSE`

I was thinking about how President Obama was going about, solving the economic crisis which, apparently has him in a mess, politically? Make no beans about it the Country is experiencing the worst deficit and to put it in perspective the cumulated deficit of the Bush Administration does not even come close to what Obama has created in 7months;  

I have not understood any of his actions on issues such as the Cap and Trade, the Government take-over of our health care, buyouts of the automakers, wall street banks and implanting of cash into banks who didn’t need it, Fanny and Freddie, the TARP debacles, and the continuations cash stimulus started by Bush. Why would he put our Country deeper in debt by with all theses tax heavy policies? However, I believe I now understand what his problems are and why, I believe, he is very mixed up. This will take a while to explain because he has been mentored on this for many years.

Remember, Obama’s claim to fame is that he was a Community Organizer (CO) which may explain his priorities and his actions. So lets examine how a CO is trained and what for. Obama’s mentor was a guy named Saul Alinsky also from Chicago.

According to NewsMax.com reporter, Diane Alden’s article on Jan. 2003, “Saul Alinsky died in 1972. He was a Marxist grassroots organizer who spent much of his life organizing rent strikes and protesting conditions of the poor in Chicago in the 1930s. However, unlike Christian socialist and activist for the poor Dorothy Day, Alinsky's real claim to fame was as strategist for anti-establishment '60s radicals and revolutionaries.

Indeed, Alinsky wrote the rule book for '60s radicals like Bill and Hillary Clinton, George Miller and Nancy Pelosi. He considered Hillary Rodham to be one of his better students and asked her to join him in his efforts as an organizer of radical leftist causes. But Hillary had other fish to fry on her climb to national prominence.” Alinsky’s book Rules for Radicals, a Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals Copyrighted 1971 is the book that I will use to prove why Obama is not the world class leader he thinks he is.

Alinsky took years to develop his skills as an CO and he did that at the very same place Obama learned, trained and practiced this same trade. Alinsky had a much harder time becoming an OC because he was white and a Jew, at least Obama had color on his side. I will examine that the CO’s attributes may be the cause of, why his policies are failing.

The main purpose of the CO is to excite the downtrodden and go after the chosen establishment. Obama’s chose to do his work in an area that the people would label him “an outsider”. According to Alinsky that meant that he had to immerse himself and absorb the community’s language, culture, religion, mannerisms, anecdotes, values and idioms. Since Obama was just out of law school he had to find a job in order to support himself but would also support him in his CO endeavor. He went to work for a law firm that would pay him for doing some low profile pro-bono cases while supporting his CO training.

According to Alinsky it is rare if not impossible to find a person that would make a perfect CO. There are some qualities that all CO’s must have, at least to some extent:

  • Curiosity—Is what makes a CO organize. He is driven by a compulsive curiosity that knows no limits, and never ends.
  • Irreverence—and curiosity go together. The basic question asked by the CO is: Is this true just because this has always been this way, is it the best or the right way of life, religion, political or economic value.
  • Imagination---Is the dynamism that starts and sustains him in his whole life of action as a CO. It ignites and feeds the force that drives him to organize for change.
  • A sense of humor—To maintain sanity.
  • An organized personality—The OC must be well organized himself so he can be comfortable in a disorganized situation. There must enough issues to organize because the OC needs the action as much as an individual needs oxygen.

The basic difference between the Organization (ORG) Leader who the CO works for is that the leader goes on to build power and fulfills his desires to hold and to wield power for social and personal purposes. The organizer finds his goal in the creation of power for others.

Obama’s campaign was a result of his learning how to be a CO. His command of rhetoric without factoring in the specifics was basically his intent and not what he was trained to do. See I think he thought the people he was preaching too knew what he was going to say, he was right by the way, and all he had to do was build the rhetoric around his two main premises of “hope and change”.

Alinsky says a CO must be a well-integrated political schizoid, in order not to slip into becoming a true believer. Before men can attack an issue it must be polarized. Men will act when they are convinced that their cause is 100% on the side of the “Angels”, meaning the people to be organized, and the opposition is 100% behind the “Devil”, the establishment. The CO knows that there can be no action until issues are polarized to this degree.

Here is where Obama’s problems started. January 20, 2009 at 12:01 pm he became the Establishment “Leader” and prior to that during his campaign he was acting against the Government or establishment. Well guess what, he just became the “Devil”, establishment, and now the people or” Angels” are fighting against the “Devil’s” policies. Another problem, in his prior life as a CO, he was organizing and working with the downtrodden, uneducated and mostly non-working “Angels”. Now, as the Devil, he is tying to organize the masses of “Angels” most of which are smarter and have more experience in just about everything than he.

Alinsky says the CO must always accept without fear or worry that the odds are always against him.

Now the people or “Angels” are Communities, without fear or worried about losing their jobs, there are none to be had. They are Moms, both at home or working, and worried about their children’s future and retired individuals, so the CO switch has been flipped. The “Angels” are coming together and will fight because they know they are right and because of the Obama’s tactics of degrading the “Angels”. I think the “Angels” will win.

Keep in mind that health care has always been the major entry into Socialism around the world and the “Angels” know this. Obama didn’t expect that they knew. A lot of these “Angels” came from Socialistic countries, and we have a lot of them.

Alinsky says the organizer is constantly creating the new out of the old. Isn’t that what the “Angels” are doing? The “Angels” know what other countries got themselves into and want no part of it. They want something new not used, specially if it means a complete restructure and reengineering based on tried and failed models. They want our current capitalistic, market driven system which means getting the “Devil” out of the way. They also know that the middle class will be footing the bill and since the middle class people are not working enough to pay the taxes it is really a mute point.

The difference between the Devil (Obama) and the “Angels” is the Angels know the Country will have a double trillion dollar deficit and the people Obama was organizing, back in the day, were people who couldn’t care less. They just wanted everything other people have only they wanted it given to them.

Alinsky says, one can lack some of the qualities of an organizer, with one exception and still be effective and successful as and CO. That is exception is the art of communication.

You can imagine how wide eyed and excited the Chicago downtrodden “Angel’s were when Obama was preaching his “Your Are Entitled” message. Obama organized those same people to do his campaigning and voter registration, jumping up and down with their signs and singing the phrases “Obama is the one we’ve been waiting for” for his State Senator election as well as National campaigns. Does ACORN mean anything to you? He had these people believing he would pay their mortgages, if they had one, and they could pressure the banks to provide them with mortgages, even if they had no money.  Does Sub-prime mean anything to you?

It is easy to communicate with “Angels” as long as the Angels are waiting to hear that they can get something just by hollering screaming at the “Devil” establishment. Obama now represents the “Devil” and the “Angels” are now doing the hollering and they aren’t buying what he is selling.    

Alinsky says the CO must have a sense of humor if he is to stay sane.

Obama, now the ”Devil” leader, is either preaching or telling us “Angels” what is going to happen. He has made more speeches than any other President. To his followers he is “the anointed one” and they love him and his rhetoric. To the serious listeners that’s all they hear and the only sense of humor I have heard is when he makes demeaning remarks about the fools, “Angels” protesting. Then his followers laugh. What kind of humor can he have when he always talking to a teleprompter it’s like he’s watching a tennis match. As a CO he might have been a good communicator but as the “Devil” leader he has no sense of humor and he stinks.

Alinsky says a maxim of effective communication is that the people, “Angels”, have to make their own decisions and that utilizing the process of back and forth and give and take will lead to the “Angels” making the decision, that the CO is looking for.

Obama as the “Devil” leader has already made the decisions for the “Angels”. He is just telling us how it is going to be. What would that be? Well he is pushing a socialistic health care system and the “Angels” don’t want that, they want an improved economy and job creation now. We the “Angels” are not buying his snake oil treatment of health care. Obama really gets mixed up when it comes to questions. As a CO he was used to asking the questions in order to get in a back and forth discussion knowing that eventuality he and the “Angel” Organization would agree on the problems and a course of action. Now as the “Devil” leader and taken off the teleprompter he doesn’t really know what to say. He gets in most of his trouble when in this situation. He is also is speaking to well educated, more experienced and much smarter “Angel” community who know that there are better solutions then the ones he is presenting.

Alinsky says communication without factoring in specifics of experience becomes just rhetoric and carries a limited meaning. Obama has no experience in any of the issues the “Angels” want to have resolved, and the Congress knowing what he doing is wrong, is just playing party politics.

If you have seen any of the townhall type meetings he has participated in you would have seen that he starts out with the typical Obama style teleprompter speech. You know that the meeting participants have been screened and the questions are of a low ball nature. You also should have seen that he allows only around eight questions after which he offers at least a 5 to 8 minute rhetoric answer, mostly claiming none of this is his fault. I watched two of these meetings and there is always a question about the dissenting “Angels” (people) raising a ruckus at their Congressmen meetings. His answer is usually that they are part of the rightwing influenced by talk radio and FOX News. He still thinks he is talking about the “Devil” establishment.

Alinsky makes a point that at some time it should become obvious that communications occur concretely by means of ones Specific Experience. Obama has none and can not relate to the “Angels” who have been through this stuff before. He can not communicate with them.

Alinsky says the real job of the CO is to maneuver and bait the establishment so that they attack the CO publicly as a dangerous enemy. Again Obama as 01/20/2009 became the establishment and he is getting attacked by the Angel community who is smarter. WHAT IS HE TO DO???? He has never been an establishment leader, and neither has anybody in his administration. If the Country wasn’t in this mess this would be something to watch and see how it plays out.

Alinsky says an OC’s biggest job was to give the people the feeling that they can do something they thought they could never do and that the idea of an organization means power. This is what I mean: During his campaign he was very well organized. He was empowering the people to organized against anybody that represent the establishment that included John McCain, Hillary Clinton, just to name the obvious. He organized the use of the internet and raised a ton of cash, the radical leftwing websites and Blogs to blast all the hate they could at the other candidates and the Bush administration.

Well he is now the “Devil Establishment” leader and even though the majority of Congress is of the same political party as he, he now has no idea what to do. There are dissenters everywhere and now he is the “Devil” between himself and deep in “Angels” swimming to attack him.

There are 10 rules for the radical OCs that pertains to the ethics of “Means and Ends” I am not going to comment on all of the, just a few to prove my point. Alinsky says:                                 

·         “One concern with ethics of means and ends varies inversely with one’s distance from the conflict”.

I define the conflict as what the “Angels” (people) think is necessary vs. what the “Devil” wants to inflict on them. The “Angels” want to see some movement in the growth of the economy and jobs before anything else. The “Devil” thinks this can be part of his health care reform, and his energy policy. The “Angels” sees these as political policy, an inroad to Socialism, to grow the size of government, raise taxes and diminished liberty. The “Devil” looks at the people as stupid and blames them for believing the conservative news. The “Devil” goes on the attack calling the “Angels” everything under the sun. The “Devil” then decides to change the name from “health care reform” to “healthcare insurance reform” and blames the big insurance companies for the mess. That didn’t work, the Devil went after the clergy to make if a moral issue, that didn’t work, now they are thinking of calling it Teddy care. Congress may not know what they are doing but the “Angels” say we don’t care what you call it or what color lipstick you put on the pig it’s still a pig. This is where the conflict now stands and Obama is so far removed from it.  In his mind the “Angels” created the great divide and he wants it his way for political reasons and he seems determined to widen the gap even further.

·         This rule must be a major conflict with Obama now being the establishment “Devil” and not the CO. The rule is “that the judgment of the ethics of means is dependent upon the political position of those sitting in judgment”

I bet during his vacation he was wondering what the heck is he going to do? His approval ratings are sinking faster than the Titanic and the people don’t want either of his big policies, of a Government takeover of health care or the Cap and Trade. While he thought he was elected on these issues he was not listening to the issues of his opposition. The people sitting in judgment were his opposition and now they are joined by many of the people that supported him. His supporters all but dismissed the fact and believed him when he said he would end the wars but instead he stayed the Bush course. So far he is batting zero with the Independents and they are not to be screwed again. WHO IS NOW SITTING IN JUDGMENT? Is it Congress? Is it the special interest lobbies?? Or is it the Angels. Right now he cannot figure what means he should employ to reach his ends.

·         Another rule is that the concern with ethics increases with the number of means available and vice versa.

This is a rule he must also be thinking about very hard now. But don’t forget he is now the “Devil” establishment and not the CO which choice of means or ends he is going to select. Obama has to make some hard decisions who he going to throw under the bus. He has many choices like the leftwing radicals in and out of Congress, the big money supporters like George Soros, Nancy Pelosi, who has already told him she will not let a health care come before the House without there being a single payer option, Senior Citizens, organized labor, big business, the Lawyer lobby. He has already made some substantial deals with labor and the pharmaceutical Co. I am sure he has done the same for the TORT lawyer lobby as well

·         Alinsky says, The CO simultaneous carries on many functions as he attacks and disrupts the prevailing power.

Obama used some of his teaching and practices when he was organizing the South side of Chicago crowd. Being the “Devil” establishment now he looks at the “Angel” community as a disorganized bunch of mobsters or Astroturf Nazis, and he decided to go on the attack. But Alinsky says there is no such animal as a disorganized community. It is a contradiction in terms to use the two words “disorganized” and “community” together. The word community itself means an organized communal life, people living in an organized fashion.

Just the fact that the different communities all over the Country came together to voice their opinions and concerns at TEA Parties and in Townhall meetings should be proof enough for Obama.

All the attacks, even paying ACORN to disrupt town meetings has not worked so now he has to come up with something better, or get this PIG of a health care plan pushed thorough the backdoor. My opinion it will be the backdoor approach or it will be completely rewritten.

·         Obama must realize by now that he, as Alinsky says “one can not negotiate without power to compel negotiation”. Obama only has power over the Neanderthals in the “Devil” Congress. He is totally out of touch with the “Angel” community. I think his biggest mistake was to make health care a one issue crusade and the “Angels” look at it, not only as a health care issue but as a multi-issue problem which, the others must have be solved before his single issue of healthcare. The “Angels” are using commonsense, as well as sub-consciously using an Alinsky rule that an organization must have more than one issue to disrupt the “Devil. They know that Obama has added multi- trillions of dollars to the National Deficit, an that fixing the economy and job creation has to be resolved first. All the “Angels” have to do is ask detailed questions and the “Devils” Minions start to fall apart. One very basic question is where is he money coming from? The one question they know the answer to but are afraid to tell them. “TAXES”, and MEDICARE CUTS, which they still think are the answers. But in most cases they don’t know the answers because most of the”Devils” have not read any of the bills.

So to sum-up Obama’s problems, he has been trying to employ CO tactics a strategy believing the townhall people are numskulls. Instead they are communities who by nature are already organized. He has not made the switch to the establishment leader and he still has not taken ownership of the problems that needs to be solved. He still believes the economy, jobs and the mounting deficit are of George Bush’s creation and he can use that as a crutch.

President Obama must soon find his way and take ownership of these problems. He might think HC is what propelled him into office but it wasn’t. He pitched Change, Change. Change, he knew what the problems were but he just wanted to take advantage of the crisis and get his dream of a Government Health Care single payer system voted in.

Obama is home from vacation and has scheduled a joint meeting of Congress sometime Labor Day week. Let’s see if he has learned anything while he was away.                     

Tags: president  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

This Letter Must be Sent NOW

 

Please send this letter, E-Mail, FAXs now.

E-Mail: Your Sen./Rep.] [FIRST NAME] [LAST NAME]

Send letters or FAX all others.  

RE: Please REJECT Socialized Health Care!

Dear [Sen./Rep.] [LAST NAME]:

This is a letter I thought I would never write. I know you know what I am about to say but it appears some of you have forgotten. You keep adding more and more junk entitlements to the political menu. We have ragging debt which is causing us to pay an interest payment of around the amount of $9m a month. We have people out of work. The housing market is in the tank. The stock market is falling. (This upturn is a reaction to Obama’s falling approval numbers). All other major sectors are falling as well.

So what does Congress do but introduce new TRILLION DOLLAR programs (Government take over of health, A Cap and Tax energy bill, Bail-outs and the take-over of other sectors),  and all this with no money in the bank. This is like adding fuel to an already out of control fire. So now what does the administration say their going to do? They want to RAISE TAXES ON THE MIDDLE INCOME EARNERS, because, there are not enough rich people to tax. Oh wait a minute aren’t they, the middle income earners, the ones out of work??         

Without jobs no one can pay taxes. We have around 10% of Americans out of work. That equates close to 22% less revenue for the government coffers. In terms of dollars the Government as lost $330 Billion in revenue in the first six months of this year.  

You don’t have to be a tax evader to figure this out. Lets just stop all of this BS and concentrate on the one problem that has to be solved first. THAT AIN’T HEALTH CARE.


I'm writing to ask you to please REJECT H.R. 3200, "America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009," or any other attempt to force socialized health care or government-mandated health insurance on Americans.

Our current health care system is not broken, it is just too expensive. About 95% of Americans have health plans available to them and around 85% like what they have. A lot of that cost has to do with government mandates of which there are 6,000 of them across the country. Malpractice insurance for doctors one other reason for the high costs as well. 

The technology boom, not physician care have completely changed the playing field in regards to medical care. If we didn't have all the technology that is at our fingertips for the care of so many exhaustively expensive medical conditions we wouldn't be having this discussion today.

There are a variety of procedures that cost upwards of $100,000, and extended care conditions that run upwards of $1,000,000. Organ transplant surgery, in vitro fertilization, high tech care of extremely premature infants, multiple modality cancer treatments, whole body and organ scanning, cardiac procedures, endoscope procedures, have all exploded in terms of their use in our country. This would never have occurred if they were not all subsidized with health insurance monies. All this could be lost if the government got control of the insurance plans. 

 At least in my opinion leave the current health care plans as is until the real problem is solved. Just in case you forgot, nothing will get fixed or work if people don’t have JOBS. Money must be generated FROM JOBS. Government revenue is generated from taxes on people who HAVE JOBS. JOBS that produce products and services, from the private sector not Government jobs that consume taxes. JOBS must be created first, fast, and foremost.

 
Sincerely,

[YOUR NAME]

Tags: president  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Good Lord, What Have We Done

 

As I watched TV last week I saw something that I did not believe. I saw the President of the US go into a complete meltdown. I think the President’s hidden agenda, by that I mean hidden from all the people who voted for him, reared its ugly head.

I think the Clintons had it right, during the primary campaign, when they pushed the notion that Obama would be a black President for black people and all others were non-players. Obama pushed the race card frequently, and only started to back off when his beloved Pastor Reverend Wright’s sermons came to the fore front and temporarily derailed his campaign. He must have been sleeping for the 20years he attended Wright’s Church, because he claimed he never heard them. Check out my BLOG Post “The Clinton’s Strategy and Tactics”

President Obama is half black and half white. What better reason could one have to bring the two races together? Obama instead, in his younger life while he was smoking whatever, decided that he was going to be Black so he could obtain better governmental perks. He has no slave blood flowing in is veins so why else would he push the Radical Black Theology instead of trying to promote Black and White togetherness and put an end to the racial hate divide the Black population have been preached to for a hundred years? My BLOG Post “Can Wright Be Right” andBLOG Post “Black Suppression”

We all knew of his associations with a lot of shady people. We knew he was a study of the radical Saul Alinsky, as was his Secretary Of State Hillary Clinton. We also knew of his wife Michelle’s Princeton Thesis on the separation of the races. My Blog Post “Is This the Real Michelle Obama”.  President Obama’s Thesis has a lock in it so we really don’t know what his thoughts were “back in the day” but I don’t think we would be at all surprised.

So what happened last week that made me reflect on the past? Well four things:

First, The President nominated a racial empathically candidate for the Supreme Court, Sonia Sotomayor. She has been, when she was on the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, turned over by the U.S. Supreme Court many times. She may be qualified but her past clearly puts her on the side of people of color.

Second, the latest case was the reversal of the New Haven Firefighters because of a test for promotion eligibility, which none of the Black Firefighters passed. Consequently the test was thrown out by city because they were afraid of having a NAACP law suite filed.

In its last session until September, the Supreme Court's conservative majority prevailed in a 5-4 ruling that faulted the city of New Haven and the lower courts that had upheld the city's discarding of results of an exam in which no African-Americans scored high enough to be promoted to lieutenant or captain. Obama did not agree with the Court’s decision and thought the lower court should have been upheld, in favor of the city.  He said the court took a different turn.  Does this mean that the test was two hard for the Black Firefighters? “Just what we need taking the dumbest to lead men into a fire storm”.  Do you think?

Third, the President jump in on the case in Cambridge Police being called by 911 to investigate a break in at what turned out to be a house of a friend of the President. I might add that this house was being rented and Henry Louis Gates Jr. was trying to jimmy the door. Again the President played the race card by saying: "Now, I don't know, not having been there and not seeing all the facts, what role race played in that. But I think it's fair to say, number one, any of us would be pretty angry; number two, that the Cambridge police acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home; and, number three, what I think we know separate and apart from this incident is that there's a long history in this country of African-Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcement disproportionately. That's just a fact," Obama said.  He also should have said, it could be the fact that 70% of the crime in this country is being committed by people of color.

Fourth, remember the picture of the Black Panthers standing in front of a polling place with night-sticks in hand? Well a civil action has been in the works since November for the intimidation of the white voter’s trying to enter to vote. That action was dismissed, by the Justice Department just today, 07/29/2009, without explanation. “Back On Black”

I said before, I don’t remember where or even when, our new President is not the caliber of person we need as President. He is not a leader, he has never ran a business, or even collected a paycheck very long, his experience and view of the economy is not even at a 101 level, his foreign policy is out to lunch, he does not love this country which comes out in all his speeches overseas, despises our troops and the police, and he has never taken ownership of the major problems. He is still running a campaign against President Bush. Every time he opens his mouth he knocks the heck out of big business and the rich by telling them he will tax more and more, and cap their wages, which they did today 08/01/2009, and he seems to want to maintain the separation of the races. He always puts the Black population first, even if it doesn’t make any sense.

In my opinion we are going to have a racial back-lash in this country sooner or later. This is not about Obama’s love for the “people of color” This is not about his love of country, this is about stacking the voting coffers of the Democrat party with people with low level or no educations, and non-English speaking illegal aliens. This will dumb-down our American Population on average just so government can control them. Supply their "daily bread" and they will do anything you want them to do.    

WE MUST VOTE THESE RACIAL, RADICAL SOCIALESTS OUT OF OFFICE, COME THE MIDTERM ELECTIONS, AND STOP THIS ASSUALT ON OUR COUNRY.    

Tags: president  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

PAY CZAR

 Please go to this link and then wonder what is next?  http://www.gopusa.com/theloft/?p=1579
 
Obama did somthing yesterday which all of the Democrat Congress bought into, I think was in reaction to his spending.  He sent Congerss a Pay as You Go plan for them to act on. You could tell by the look Nancy Pelosi's face that she thought she again put something over on the American people.  Lets face it, Obama has spent the money and we will pay dearly when the Bush tax cuts expire.
 
That in my opinion is " Obama GO then Taxpayers PAY"
Tags: president  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama In Cairo

I was prepared to write about the Nancy Pelosi CIA thing but things are happening so fast, to stay current, is really faster than I can write.

I listened to Obama’s Cairo speech and I thought WOW what the heck was he thinking? I have to say Obama is a great speaker, thank God for the teleprompter, and he got some applause form the attendees. But who were the people there? We did not see them, so should we rule out the only ones applauding were the President’s entourage.

I do know there were at least three groups who weren’t there, Israel, Fatah and Hamas. Obama was talking to the people who have heard most of what he was saying before, at least since the Carter administration, however there was no mention of the “Palestinian Authority” (PA) which was defeated in the last Palestinian election by Hamas. The PA set up shop in the West Bank and is still considered by the U.S. and others as the leader of the Palestinian people.

From (IsraelNN.com) Even as U.S. President Barack Obama tells the world there must be a Palestinian state, the residents of such a “state” themselves say this is not a viable possibility.

A poll released this week shows that 51% of Arabs in Judea, Samaria and Gaza believe that unity between the two new Arab entities in the Land of Israel – Hamas-controlled Gaza and Fatah-ruled Judea and Samaria - will happen “only after a long time.” Another 27% says the split is permanent.

These two Palestinian groups, Fatah and Hamas, are at war with one another which equates to the same situation we faced it Iraq, and still face.

I am of the opinion that what the President did with this speech will elevate the tensions between the factions, where as Israel will speed up their expansion of the Gaza and Hamas will start lobbing more missiles into Israel.

In order to solve this problem Israel will have to pursue a SURG strategy much like the US did in Iraq. The possibility of that happening is ZERO since many of the people in the West Bank have relatives in Gaza and the US and international community will side with the Palestinians.

Many times since becoming President, Obama has said things that he has not considered the consequences, whether intended or unintended, by his talk. This is a major one because he essentially implied that if Israel took any offensive actions with Iran or Hamas the US would not support them, although he did say in Germany the Israel is our ally, playing to a different crowd I guess.             

Tags: president  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Spend, Spend, Spend

 

On June 17th 2008 I wrote a BLOG post titled Change, Change, Change. I would like the readers of this BLOG Post to read that one before reading this. One thing more, I would never call the Democrat Party, the Democratic Party. If anything I would label them the Socialists Democrat Party.

The Heritage Foundation has come up with the cumulative cost of $8,400,000,000,000.00 for this spending bill for the 8 years, 2010-2017. That is about $28,000 for every man, woman and child in the USA and a family of four, $112,000.

On top of this, since Obama came on board on January 20th 2009 the stock market went plunging from 7949.09 to, on March 5th 6594.44 which amounts to $2.5 trillion in market losses. Even prior to that when it was almost certain he would be the Domocrat nominee the market started heading down from 12,000.

We have lost over 50% of the savings in our 401K accounts leaving retirees relying on their own savings CDs and other out of stock market accounts. Even the Wall Street Journal has said that “the economy actually would be recovering were it not for the anti-growth policies being pursued by the Obama administration”.

Obama has managed to mismanage just about every financial and industrial sector in the nation with his new policies and the articles in his Stimulus Bill and his proposed budget or just by opening is inexperienced mouth.

Obama has talked about the need to nationalize our banking industry, government control over our insurance and a European socialistic universal health care plan.

The Government will mandate the rules of banks when lending money. He has said that even solvent banks have to accept the money so they can lend more. This is so he can get control of all banks. Many solvent banks have sent the money back regardless of his order, saying, they have plenty of loan available money and in fact have not turned down any qualified borrowers.

There goes the HMO, PPO, Blue Cross and God knows how many other Health Insurance Companies. The Government will expand to about 650,000 more employees for oversight, distribution of money, and administration of services. 

Obama’s talking about cutting back our spending on strategic defense systems, raising taxes on large corporations and even on money made off shore by multinational corporations.

Say so long to thousands of defense manufacturing jobs, and also will put the USA’s security at risk.

Just by putting a cap on executive salaries will cost the Government $11billion in tax revenue over a ten year period.  Letting the Bush tax cuts expire in 2010 from would cause large and multinational corporations to relocate their headquarters in other countries, which many companies already have. Obama is saying he supporting small business by cutting their Capitial Gains tax, but 95% of small businesses only pay income tax which will go up because they make above the $250.000 limit.  Remember Joe the Plummer?    

The Government is the taking away the tax deduction on high end home mortgage interest and just recently the Democrats are talking about using the money in our 401K plans to bolster up Social Security.

If you remember this whole downward cycle started with the subprime mortgage debacle. Fannie Mae finally became insolvent and could not take on any more of the bundled mortgages from conventional banks. Of course the Democrat war machine went to work on former President Bush and blamed his administration for lack of over sight. This was a good move by the Dems. who wanted to direct the attention away from their own lack of understanding of the problems that would occur in later years after the Clinton admistration in the 1990s forced banks to take on mortgages from people who could not meet the conventional mortgage terms.

This problem was well documented in a feature article in the New York Times on September 30th 1999. .

This is a summation of the article:

''Fannie Mae has expanded home ownership for millions of families in the 1990's by reducing down payment requirements,'' said Franklin D. Raines, Fannie Mae's chairman and chief executive officer. ''Yet there remain too many borrowers whose credit is just a notch below what our underwriting has required who have been relegated to paying significantly higher mortgage rates in the so-called subprime market.''

Demographic information on these borrowers is sketchy. But at least one study indicates that 18 percent of the loans in the subprime market went to black borrowers, compared to 5 per cent of loans in the conventional loan market.

In moving, even tentatively, into this new area of lending, Fannie Mae is taking on significantly more risk, which may not pose any difficulties during flush economic times. But the government-subsidized corporation may run into trouble in an economic downturn, prompting a government rescue similar to that of the savings and loan industry in the 1980's.

''From the perspective of many people, including me, this is another thrift industry growing up around us,'' said Peter Wallison a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. ''If they fail, the government will have to step up and bail them out the way it stepped up and bailed out the thrift industry.''

You should also know that Franklin Ranies left Fannie Mae just before the DoDo hit the fan, with millions of bonus dollars. Raines was also the lover of Barney Franks, Democrat and House Financial Services Committee Chairman.

Obama has also just about killed every energy sector with all this talk about Cap and Trade. He is not fully utilizing our own resources, and caving into the environmentalist’s lobby. This will result in a price hike and higher taxes on just about every product and service we consume and use.

Making automobiles more efficient and cheaper is just BS. The Department Of Transportation of the Federal and State’s Governments gets their income from gas tax. With the entrance of gasless motor vehicles how do you think they will come up with that money? They will mandate putting a GPS in all vehicles and tax us on our mileage at the same time they will know our exact location, like On-Star, except we won’t have the choice of purchasing it.   

In my opinion, I don’t think President Obama has the slightest idea what he is doing or how he is affecting our economy by what he is implementing or saying. If he keeps spending under his current plan, there will be less people paying into the tax pool, because of business closings and employee layoffs.  We will be, in effect be pulling a Bernie Madoff on ourselves. Obama might be a Harvard Graduate but he has no practical application in Business or working in the private sector. This is the problem when we elect Senators who have not run any prior form of government. Obama is using this office as his training ground and we will suffer for electing him.

President Obama will be drastically changing the model this country was founded on by converting our Capitalistic form of enterprise to a Socialistic Hugo Chaves Government model. This will never be tolerated in this country and a high tech Boston Tea Party will be waged. In the mean time all sectors of our country will be crippled for many decades.

Let me say, I believe, that Obama has created the deepening of this recession and it started when he was on the campaign trail. All of our business sectors and investors, listening to his proposeed policy statements, were laying the foundations for the time when, or if Obama, got elected. Investors and businesses, large and small, knew that they were his target. They prepared for the cataclysmic events that would occur if he got elected. As soon as they knew he would be President they started selling off. The banks stopped lending, small and large business started laying off employees, thousands even thought it was time close and take their money and run. This was their “Boston Tea Party”

Obama has to stop blaming the former President. All new Presidents inherit something from previous administrations. The sooner Obama takes ownership of these problems and stops acting in a panic mode the sooner this will be over. I am willing to bet though, the Democrats will keep on going until the 2010 Congressional elections and thereafter if they keep wining.

What more does Obama need to be convinced that we have a “supply side economy”. When the Stock market plunges, manufacturing cuts back or closes and the banks stop lending, money goes no where. I am convinced the solutions are sitting on his desk, however he has promised so many people, so many things, he has to spend, big time. His policies are all about politics while people are having some of the worst times in their lives he is serving $100.00 a pound KOBE Beef to guests in the White House and flying around on Air Force One everyday telling people his policies saved 25 jobs.

 “LET THEM EAT CAKE”.                         
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's Cabinet Choices

 

Obama’s Cabinet Choices

As fast as I was researching this BLOG post Obama’s picks were dropping like flies. However not all that should of did. 

Governor Bill Richardson: Commerce Secretary (withdrew)


Bill Richardson on Sunday announced that he was withdrawing his nomination to be President-elect Barack Obama's commerce secretary amid a grand jury investigation into how some of his political donors won a lucrative state contract which is named after him (Governor Richardson Investment Partnership, GRIP).

Eric Holder:   Attorney General (should never have been picked)

(New York Times, George Lardner)

Erick Holder facilitated the Clinton pardon of Mark Rich. In 1983 Marc Rich was indicted along with his partner, Pincus Green, and their companies on 65 counts of defrauding the I.R.S., mail fraud, tax evasion, racketeering, defrauding the Treasury and trading with the enemy. (The last of these was for an oil deal with Iran while it held American hostages.) On hearing that they were about to be prosecuted, they fled to Switzerland. For the next 17 years, Mr. Rich ducked extradition requests as well as attempts by federal marshals to arrest him in France, England, Finland and elsewhere.

Eric Holder, (WSJ.com, Debra Burlingame) also facilitated the Clinton pardon of 16 members of the Armed Forces of National Liberation, FALN (the Spanish acronym), a clandestine terrorist group devoted to bringing about independence for Puerto Rico through violent means. Its members waged war on America with bombings, arson, kidnappings, prison escapes, threats and intimidation. The most gruesome attack was the 1975 Fraunces Tavern bombing in Lower Manhattan. Timed to go off during the lunch-hour rush, the explosion decapitated one of the four people killed and injured another 60.

FALN bragged about the bloodbath, calling the victims "reactionary corporate executives" and threatening: "You have unleashed a storm from which you comfortable Yankees can't escape." By 1996, the FBI had linked FALN to 146 bombings and a string of armed robberies -- a reign of terror that resulted in nine deaths and hundreds of injured victims.

Timothy Geithner: Treasury Secretary (should never have been picked)

 (Politico)

The Wall Street Journal/New York Times reported that Geithner had failed to pay $42,000 in taxes and had employed a housekeeper whose work permit had expired. But minutes after the news broke, the Obama transition team pushed back with talking points -- distributed to Capitol Hill, K Street and congressional reporters -- in which it portrayed the problems as simple mistakes or oversights." He admitted that he had failed to pay tens of thousands of dollars in federal self-employment taxes while working for the International Monetary Fund despite having signed paperwork acknowledging the obligation.

Hillary Clinton: Secretary of State (should never been picked)

Hillary simply cannot tell the truth. Here's her scorecard: (Dick Morris)

Admitted Lies

• Chelsea was jogging around the Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001. (She was in bed watching it on TV.)
• Hillary was named after Sir Edmund Hillary. (She admitted she was wrong. He climbed Mt. Everest five years after her birth.)
• She was under sniper fire in Bosnia. (A girl presented her with flowers at the foot of the ramp.)
• She learned in The Wall Street Journal how to make a killing in the Futures Market.

                (The WSJ was not reporting on the futures back then)  

Whoppers She Won't Confess To

• She didn't know about the FALN pardons.

By Ron Kolb: Hillary Clinton, Terrorism and the FALN

Despite the Clintons' repeated denials, there is evidence that the pardons were offered to the terrorists with Hillary Clinton's full knowledge. In the Oct. 4, 1999, issue of the New Republic, Jose Rivera, then a New York City Councilman, is quoted as saying that he personally approached Hillary on Aug. 9, 1999. He said he gave her a packet of information about the FALN members along with a personal letter asking her to "speak to the president and ask him to consider granting clemency" to them.

Two days later, on Aug. 11, President Clinton would offer pardons to the terrorists.

(Dick Morris)
• She didn't know that her brothers were being paid to get pardons that Clinton granted.
• Taking the White House gifts was a clerical error.
• She didn't know that her staff would fire the travel office staff after she told them to do so.
• She didn't know that the Peter Paul fundraiser in Hollywood in 2000 cost $700,000 more than she reported it had.
• She opposed NAFTA at the time.
• She was instrumental in the Irish peace process.
• She urged Bill to intervene in Rwanda.
• She played a role in the '90s economic recovery.
• The billing records showed up on their own.
• She thought Bill was innocent when the Monica scandal broke.
• She was always a Yankees fan.
• She negotiated for the release of refugees in Macedonia (who were released the day before she got there).

Tom Daschle: Secretary of Health and Human Services (withdrew)

(Bloomberg.com)

Daschle, who withdrew yesterday as President Barack Obama’s nominee for the cabinet post, spent four years helping friend Leo Hindery Jr. raised cash for purchases including 1970s hit dance show “Soul Train.” The appointment ran into trouble after he amended three years of tax returns for unreported income, including personal use of a car and driver provided by Hindery’s buyout firm. Daschle bowed out of the confirmation process, saying the tax issue had become a distraction.

Make way for Dr. Howard Dean.

Nancy Killefer: Chief Performance Officer (withdrew)

(Michelle Malkin)

Just before the Daschle announcement came the withdrawal of Nancy Killefer. She was tapped to be President Obama's "Chief Performance Officer," overseeing compliance, organizational effectiveness and waste management across every federal agency. But the former Clinton Treasury official and head of the prestigious Washington office of the management consulting firm McKinsey & Company, Inc., couldn't be bothered to manage her own household help effectively. She failed for a year and a half to pay employment taxes and had an outstanding tax lien on her home. The lien was worth less than $1,000.

Janet Napolitano: Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security

Janet Napolitano was confirmed as secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. She previously served as Arizona governor and is not in favor of a closed southern boarder and is against the Real-ID. She is not in favor of current laws calling for the arrest and deportation of illegal immigrants.

We will need to watch out, with her in this position.

Leon Panetta: CIA Director (should not have been picked because of no intelligence background)

(National Review On Line)

Before he was a Democratic congressman, before he was director of the Office of Management and Budget, before he was White House chief of staff, and certainly before he was President Obama’s nominee for CIA director, Leon Panetta was director of the Office of Civil Rights at the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare—the precursor to today’s Department of Health and Human Services. He was also a Republican.

Around the time he left HEW in 1970, Panetta may have been involved in leaking a secret White House document that caused a major embarrassment for the Nixon administration and had policy repercussions for decades.

Nixon, appointed Pat Moynihan—who had served as assistant secretary of labor for policy in the Kennedy and Johnson administrations—as his urban-affairs adviser and all-around White House intellectual.


Moynihan suspected that a staffer at HEW had leaked the memo, and that HEW was responsible for leaking his authorship of the black family report five years earlier. (Decades later, Senator Moynihan would get some measure of revenge by having the Social Security Administration removed from HHS and made into an independent agency.) Although memos leak all the time, and the Leakers are rarely identified, The New Republic’sJohn Osbornereported in a March 1970 profile of Moynihan that Leon Panetta was a prime suspect in the leak.

How cool is it to have someone who suspected of leaking secret documents now ready to head up the CIA.

Hilda Solis: Labor Secretary (should not have been picked by Obama standards)

Hilda Solis was haven sent to Obama. She is one of the authors of the Card-Check Labor bill that she and Pelosi have been tying to get voted on since coming into power in 2004. Labor Unions are one of the major contributors to the campaigns of the Democrats.

What she forgot to tell the President was that she secretly was the non-paid treasure of the labor lobby group who has been funneling big money in their PACs, in other words she is another lobbyists that Obama said he would never have in his administration.

Comments in general

Remember, any Democrat bill that contains the words FREE or FAIR usually means the opposite.       

Obama certainly knows how to pick them, maybe it’s because of his own shady associations, and we will “PAY to PLAY” the price before the he ends the first two years of his first term.

Starting already with the new State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP)

I knew there was a “Stupid University” in Washington now we know the Dean of Admissions. Obama signed into law on Feb. 4th 2009, a bill which will expand SCHIP to children in families of four earning up to $80,000 per year. The Congressional Budget Office reports that 77 percent of such children already have private health insurance. The cool thing is that it will be funded by raising the cigarette tax up to a dollar. Aren’t we trying to convince people not to smoke? How will we pay for this stupid bill if smoking is cut in half?

The National Bureau of Economic Research, economists Jonathan Gruber and Kosali Simon found that, as eligibility expands, "private insurance coverage is reduced by 60 percent as much as public insurance coverage rises." The CBO estimates that the reduction in private coverage is as much as 50 percent -- in other words, for every 100 children enrolled in SCHIP
Tags: president  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Let Them Eat Cake

 
The Yellow Cake Story:
Did Valerie Plame, Joe Wilson and Richard Armitage conspire to force a transition of power in the White House by essentially perjuring themselves in front of a Congressional Panel?  I firmly believe they did. When they got involved in something they had no business being into they conspired to take down the President of the United States.

It went something like this. The American troops after invading Iraq in 2003 found 550 metric tons of yellow cake nuclear seed material that they later found out was purchased from Niger by Saddam Hussein. In the time between Saddam was told by the UN to disclose the ware bouts of his nuclear cachet and the time the US troops invaded he was still trying to purchase the more yellow cake material from Niger.

For some reason Valerie Plame, who claimed she was outed by the Bush administration, decided to lobby some low lever CIA official which sent her husband, Joe Wilson a former U.S. Ambassador, to Niger under operational clearance, to fine out if there was any truth that Saddam Hussein was trying to purchase “uranium yellow cake”. After Wilson was debriefed by the CIA it was concluded that he had not learn if the report was true or not but he claimed that there was no contact. According to the Senate Intelligence Committee, the debriefers didn’t share Wilson’s information with, among others, the White House because they concluded Wilson didn't come up with much. Plame said she was outed to retaliate against her husband, former Ambassador Joe Wilson, because he reported no evidence of any meeting discussing yellow cake took place  

Wilson never wrote a formal report, when he returned, but he did write an July 6, 2003 op-ed in the N.Y. Times in which he wrote that there was no evidence that Saddam Hussein sought yellowcake uranium from Niger, and that he had told that fact to the administration which rejected it, and that President Bush lied to the nation to justify the war when, during his January 2003 State of the Union address. President Bush had said that “the British Government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.”  Iraqi Prime Minster, Nouri al Maliki, later confirmed that Saddam Hussein had been trying to purchase uranium yellow cake from Niger.

Now it seems the Bush Administration as well as the Tony Blair Administration has been living with a horrendous burden and taking heat from the American and British people as well as the U.S. Congress that they lied about Saddam Hussein’s nuclear ambitions just to go to war. The fact is when U.S. Troops invaded Iraq they found 550 metric tons of “uranium yellow cake” but both administrations had to keep it under raps for five years for fear of having it stolen by Al Qaada.

The Associated Press on July 6, 2008 reported on the find and explained why and how they had to guard this stuff on a 23,000 acre site and where they disposed of it.

I for one have never thought the President would have lied about the reason for going into Iraq. No President in his right mind would do something like that. Now it’s time to do some apologizing to President Bush. He took the heat from the Democrats and the far left BLOGS. It’s time to admit that this President is a World Leader, saw the danger, and took it on the chin at the cost of very high cost and lowing ratings (let them eat cake).He kept this secret even when former Ambassador Joe Wilson, former CIA operative, Valerie Plame the Ambassador’s wife, and a former deputy secretary of state Richard L. Armitage were conspiring to take him down.  

Wilson is a chronic liar; He lied about who got him the assignment to Niger. He lied about what he was told by Mayaki, the Niger official, who told him just the opposite. He never filed a report, because he wanted nothing in writing, at the time. He lied in his op-ed in the nation’s leading rag publication, The New York Times. His book was nothing more than lies with the intent being to take down the President. 

His wife Valerie was supposed to be under cover and claimed she was outed by the Vice President Cheney and when that didn’t hold water, then tried to take down Scooter Libby Cheney's chief of staff. Libby got jail time because he forgot a conversation between him and the VP where Plame’s name was mentioned.  Her whole story was nothing but a big hoax, and she wrote a book which documented her lies just to bring down the President.

Richard Armitage, former deputy secretary of state Richard L. Armitage just stood by and said nothing until Wilson said he was the one who reported the Niger connection and triggered the invasion Iraq. 

A Washington Post Editorial stated, “Nevertheless, it now appears that the person most responsible for the end of Ms. Plame's CIA career is Mr. Wilson. Mr. Wilson chose to go public with an explosive charge, claiming -- falsely, as it turned out -- that he had debunked reports of Iraqi uranium-shopping in Niger and that his report had circulated to senior administration officials. He ought to have expected that both those officials and journalists such as Mr. Novak would ask why a retired ambassador would have been sent on such a mission and that the answer would point to his wife. He diverted responsibility from himself and his false charges by claiming that President Bush's closest aides had engaged in an illegal conspiracy. It's unfortunate that so many people took him seriously”.

All the time the President couldn’t say a word but new he had the goods under rap and these people were lying.

We are living in a time when anybody can commit treason and get away with it. The Government must prosecute this crime and if it means exposing highly sensitive material, it should be done in a closed court room under threat of prosecution of treason. Ever since Daniel Ellsberg, exposed the Pentagon Papers, and wasn’t prosecuted, people and even the media, have been getting away with treason.          

Tags: president  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Black Suppression

 

Black Suppression:

The suppression of our black citizens by these so called black leaders, such as Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton and many black preachers, (BLOG post Can Wright be Right) has to stop.

These guys maintain control, hence obtain great wealth, by telling our black citizens that they are different from the white citizenry, they are in color only, but they, the black leaders, tell them that whitey keeps them down and from getting good jobs and they should be getting  preferential treatment over whites because of their Slave bloodline.

Black leaders have belittled black men like Bill Cosby, Thomas Sowell and many others, who drive them crazy, when they tell black audiences to stop having babies in their teens, telling black men to stay in school and get good jobs, be responsible for the kids they father. These so called black men of the cloth have even suggested the black people have to be taught differently because they learn from the opposite side of the brain.

It seems to me that black citizens who make something of themselves threaten these black leaders and their livelihood, they call them Uncle Toms and accuse them of talking down to their black brothers. There are a lot of good role models and Obama is one of them. He made something of himself and is now running for President of the United States. Just because he takes a positive position on President Bush’s “Faith Based Initiative” and wants to expand it, Jesse Jackson said Obama was talking down to the black citizens and that he wants to cut off his nuts. This is typical and they even called Obama the first white, black President. Obama didn’t come from “slave blood” but he came up through and endured the many of the same hardships as they did and these remarks are intra-racially prejudicial and these so call black leaders are the ones putting down our black citizens.

Our black citizens have to get out of the “Slave/Plantation” mindset. Nobody is going to give them money because of what happened generations ago, as they have been told. They, themselves have to get control of their lives and families. They don’t need any help from the black suppressors, they have to leave churches that preach vile and hate and integrate into white, socially uplifting, Christian churches. They have to get an education and get away from the generations depending on the government for their daily bread. Those who don’t will continue to suffer.

They are black, but they are Americans first.        

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CHANGE, CHANGE, CHANGE

 

Once again we Americans are facing a “Storm Over The Land” much like the one Carl Sandburg wrote about in is book by the same title. He was describing the lead up to the” war between the states”, or Civil War, but the cycle of events can be paralleled when describing the situation we are experiencing now.

Our storm started brewing after the resignation of President Richard Nixon for Watergate cover up. The first clue was the ending of another war which we were wining when the United States Congress pulled the funding and hundreds of thousands people were killed and mascaraed as the result. The liberal media was portraying the Vietnam action has lost and the American people bought into it demonstrating on college campuses and in the streets. Gerald Ford took over and pardoned Nixon of all crimes past, present or future.

Sound Familiar, Harry Reid comes to mind.

The economy was exploited by the liberal left as in the tank much like their doing now. Gerald Ford was not reelected, because of the Nixon pardon, and the people were ready for the “change”.

Then out of no where came a peanut farmer from Georgia with a message of “change” which seemed to resonate with the people, much like Obama’s message of “change” is perceived today. Jimmy Carter was a southern gentleman who talked about what we’ve been through, and after the trauma of Watergate, he sounded good enough to convince the masses to vote for him. His slogan was “Hi, I’m Jimmy Carter, I’m running for President”. Sitting in his rocking chair next to the fireplace, in his sweater using his southern twang, during his so called fireside chats with the American people, he actually mesmerized the majority of the population and defeated Ford handedly.

Carter, being from the south, the American people figured he was conservative enough to get us out our problems. The first bolt of lighting came when gasoline supplies became very limited and Carter decided big Government could solve this problem. He decided to implement gas rationing which was not thought out and caused the unintended consequence of extra long waiting lines at all the gas stations, tempers flared, and fighting broke out and people were being were stranded and killed all across the country. This was the first inkling that Carter was not what everybody thought, he was just whistling Dixie.

Has it turned out, Carter had no idea how to deal a sagging economy. He started throwing money at problems and spending more than was coming in and then he taxed some more. Interest rates reach and all time high of 17%, the lines at the gas stations were still long.

Then the Iran hostage crisis happened and again with no foreign policy experience every thing he did to free the hostages ended up being a great embarrassment to the United States.

As far as the American people were concern this was a crisis of major proportions, which we should have learned from. They could not buy the things they needed, the unemployment rate was at an all time high and they could not buy a home. They were riding bicycles, taking buses, or walking to work. 

Now Obama has made a case that our current economy is in the tank and the hedge-fund,     home mortgage sub-prime market, and the price of oil was all caused by the Bush administration policies. Ask him to explain just what Bush did to cause it he will say the war in Iraq. Obama also believes that we have the worst health care in the world and we have millions of poor people who can’t afford it. He believes that we should model ourselves after the European Union. He might want to pick one country to model because all 27 countries have different plans. He says the he will give everybody the opportunity to have the same health plans as congress, which is basically the French model. 

But Obama’s message of “change” which is big government rule is exactly why this country was founded. Obama does not look back into history, but this is so fundamental, that the pilgrims came to these shores to escape intrusive government and to have freedom from government mandated religions.  

The Carter administration was a disaster and the words of the cowboy actor, Ronald Reagan, “are you better off today than you were four years ago” rang clear and were enough to bring down Carter’s hope to have another try at being President. Reagan’s message was that we need less government in our lives, less taxes and a strong military to end the cold war with the USSR.

This is the message we need to hear today. We are facing a more perfect storm, the war on terror. This is not WW II, Korea or Vietnam as the Neanderthals in Congress would have us think. This is a radical religious war, one with no boundaries, terrorists with no other purpose but to kill anybody and everybody who doesn’t agree their ways or believe in radical fundamentalist Islam. As long as there is one radical Islamic alive, this war will continue.

To make our storm a more perfect one we have, Liberal Europeanism alive and well within the Congress of the United States and leading the charge is Barack Obama. This man is perfect for the job because he is totally inexperienced and he can be guided by the Neanderthals in Congress who want total control of the people through taxing as much as he does.  

 The liberal left did a good job of demonizing just about everything the Republicans have done and especially the President. They feel it is the time to trounce on the public who fell for this nonsense before and just want “change”. I would say that the people do want change, after all the big Government we have currently and, along with radical environmentalist, the Hollywood set, and labor union lobbys all who has their claws into the Democrat party. They fund and endorse the left in congress and do the same with the radical left web-sites and BLOGS. They have convinced the mainstream media both, print and television, that they should be their reporting arm. The socialist labor unions are dictating foreign policy and trade agreements. Labor unions have control of the employee employer relations, using strikes and contract restrictions that have tied the hands of our manufacturing industry so much so that they have had to send their business to other States that have right to work laws, or overseas. Labor unions have organized just about all civil service agencies and in my opinion all have become diasterous.

The liberal left has control of all levels of our public schools and colleges, have allowed  our country to be inundated with illegal immigrants and support making them dependent on our social services.

This is why this election is about “change”. The question is what kind of “change” do we want? Obama wants massive governmental control of the people and wants to build on what his socialist Democrat party has managed to get through the Congress in order get more control and reelected.

I saw a TV news segment showing a woman standing in the midst of the aftermath of the recent horrendous earthquake in China. Everything was leveled and she was the tallest object in view. She was asked by a reporter from an international news service what she was going to do next. Her answer was I will just wait here for the government to take care of me.

In my opinion, anybody who would allow themselves, to be dependent on the Government for their “daily bread” they will eventually have to submit to the demands of the Government.

This is the type of government Obama is talking about. He will get control of us utilizing massive tax increases and more government entitlements. This has already started, about 1/3 (GAO) of our population depends on the government, for their livelihood. Our school dropout rate running about 50% or more, the influx of uneducated, non-speaking illegal and legal immigrants is beginning to climb even more rapidly. If the Democrats get overriding control of congress even with out winning the Presidency you could see massive amnesty Bills, which could easily raise the government dependency to over 50%. At this point we will be living the European life style and the Democrats will have their day. They will create alphabet soup agencies just like FDR did. They will allow Union control of  all Government agencies. The rate of people working for the Government will climb to the point they will exploited with their own tax money.

Socialism and Communism come to mind. 

Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is endowed by our creator not from our Government. We are supposed to have them, and our Democracy demands, a government abides by the rules of law, is transparent and accountable to the people, a government not in control of our educational system, and one that does not prevent our military or security agencies from protecting our country. We must have a free and unbiased press and be able to freely trade with the international community.

Yes, this election is about “change” and we have clear and definitive differences between the two parties. We can either vote for a continuation of the expansion of socialism or for a Democracy as it was meant to be. We made this choice four years ago (2004) when we reelected Present Bush along with enough seats in both houses of Congress to provide a clear path to regain our democratic principals. However the Republican Party decided not to exercise their majority position, instead they decided to be like Democrats and spend like there was no tomorrow as well as get entangled with lobbyists and morality issues. They were right there was no tomorrow and in 2006 they lost control of both houses but still maintained a filibuster position in them. I am sure they learned their lesson.

We must elect people who are not looking to just keep getting elected. We need people who will focus on the Constitution of the United States. We must get Neanderthals out of our Government.   We must appoint judges who will understand what their jobs are. We can only use our vote to do it and it must be done at every level of Government, local, County, State, and school boards. We must decide how long they should be in office, such as three terms for US Senators and four terms for a US House Representative, when they complete their terms vote them out of office no matter what. The Governments will not, in most cases, a vote to allow term limits for themselves, especially at the federal level, but we, the voters, can take matters in our own hands and just vote them out when their time comes.

A John Adams Quote:

Because power corrupts, society's demands for moral authority and character increase as the importance of the position increases”.

Campaigns must also be controlled. There is no reason a US Senator or US House Representatives have to go out of their State or District soliciting campaign donations. There is no reason anybody should receive money form PACs, labor or other lobbing organizations, DNC or RNC or local special interest groups. Each elected official, except the President of the United States, should get campaign funds only from the individuals they represent.              

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

RACEISM OR RADICALISM

 

Believe it or Not:

I believe we are experiencing something we never knew existed before.

It took a black candidate running for President of the United States of America to bring this out in the open. It is what I call “Radical Christianity” and they have a self ordained Prophet by the name of “Jeremiah”, and many followers.

If you listen the Prophet Jeremiah preach in his church about how Black Americans should hate America has he implies when he hollers ‘GOD damn America or HIV was invented by Whites to kill Blacks and that America deserves we got on 9/11 is really nothing more that “Radical Islam with their Prophet named “Muhammed” or in the United States maybe the Prophet’s name is “Farrakhan” and “Radical Clerics” preaching killing infidels and Americans in their Mosques.

What scares me is when the preachers who, defend this so called “Prophetic” activity, they say this sort of thing has been going on for many, many years.

We white people have heard the Black Preachers on TV preach to their congregations “there is no need to work, the Government will send you checks, because it owes you money from when your ancestors were slaves working for nothing. Don’t forget your beloved preacher when those checks come”.

Also during this campaign we learned that if a so-called mixed race person’s parent and their parents (grandparents) are white then he was born from “WHITE TRASK” which makes him TRASH.

I watched an interview on TV with a Black PHD Professor saying that this is the way black people express their love for Christ. Well I hope for the country’s sake that Christ is Black because, the certainty is, White people and I among them, assume a White Christ and are betting he doesn’t understand this behavior.

I think the Black population in our jails and seeing 4 and 5 generations of unwed Black Females on the streets of which all are under the age of forty with no Males, should be no surprise. It should also be no surprise that they are all waiting for Governments checks.

I see very little difference, if any, between the rants of Radical Christianity like the Prophet “Jeremiah” and Radical Islam with their Prophetic preaching. They are both very destructive.  

             

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »