About Me

Name: Jack Cruger
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

The Powell Initiative


 

The Powell Initiative

Sorry I could not let this pass

I was wondering why Colin Powell did not endorse Obama sooner rather than now.

Well in my opinion he did it for two reasons, both have a common denominator which can only be “Race”.

Colin Powell was a man who got where he was because, by his own admission, of Affirmative Action. He is now against the “Bail-Out” which would help Blacks stay in their homes that they couldn’t afford in the first place.

He was promoted by at least three Presidents over offerings that were way more qualified than him and under extreme pressure for the Black community finally backed the first Black Candidate for President. He now says if Race was the reason he would have done it sooner. He said that McCain’s selection of V.P and Joe the Plummer were the mitigating factors.

We all know that Sarah Palin has a lot more experience than either Obama or Biden in all of the governmental issues this country is facing and certainly has the ability getting things done as far as cleaning out corruption in what ever party it raises its ugly head.

Joe the Plummer hit the nail right on the head and he, Powell, saw the campaign for the first Black President going down the sewer.  

Colin Powell is the man that sat in front of his Nation and the United Nations and making the case to invade Iraq. This is the man who was head of the Joint Chiefs during the first Iraq war, in defense of Kawate, knowing that they weren’t going to cut off the snake’s head which he said they should have done in Viet Nam.

After the decision was made to go to war with Iraq, John McCain was one of the only members of congress who pressed for a bigger invasion force, than was planned which Powell also agreed with but didn’t happen. He even said “if we break it we have to fix it”.

Colin Powell had no bigger supporter than McCain so if he was against the Iraq War why didn’t he resign in a “show” that would have most likely made the powers to be take notice. I know if McCain was in that position at that time he would have put country first, and resigned and told the Country why.

You would have to be a blooming idiot to believe that Sarah and Joe were the main reasons for the endorsement at this time.

Now all of a sudden Powell feels that Obama is getting hit with unfounded racist and religious remarks and he recites a story of an American Soldier, who just happens to be a Muslim by birth. Buy virtue of the story, the Father of the solder would not tell his son he was going to fight against his own religion. Ok, if son did not know he was going to fight Muslims it should be oblivious to everybody that the soldier, or for that matter the Father were not a practicing Muslims. Maybe the Soldier was just an American and was putting his Country first.

Is Colin Powell putting his “Country” first or is he putting his ”Race” first? Powell is seeing the race for President getting tighter and the Black candidate could lose this thing. That’s the reason he jumped in, thinking he would make the difference. It may well do just that because now the Black Community may look at him as “Black” and not the Uncle Tom, he was called by them, when he was the Secretary of State under the “White Bush”.

This is truly the real “Amazing Race”.

 
After looking at the short film on U-Tube you will understand why people are a little jumpy.



Subj: Fw: October Surprise!!! BYEBYE OBAMA!!

GET THIS ONE OUT THERE FAST!!  BEFORE IT GOES MISSING OFF=2 0YOUTUBE.  YOU WILL NOT HEAR THIS ON ANY OF THE NEWS CHANNELS!!  IF YOU CAN'T CLICK ON THE LINK, COPY AND PASTE IT INTO YOUR BROWSER!! 

DON'T LET THIS ONE GET AWAY!!  WATCH IT AND FORWARD IT.  SEND IT TO EVERYBODY.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyspCRmJv7w
 
Here are some more interesting links:
 
 

RECORD VS. RHETORIC BY THOMAS SOWELL

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/10/record_vs_rhetoric.html
October 18, 2008


http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20081018/news_lz1ed18middle.html

The San Diego Union-Tribune
UNION-TRIBUNE EDITORIAL
A genuine threat

ACORN targets a weakness in democracy

October 18, 2008

 
 
Tags: election  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Man Who Could Become Presient

 

Sitting at home, drinking some homemade coffee, and watching the political polling results I fail to understand why Obama’s pole numbers are surging ahead of McCain. I guess the mantra of a Bush forth term has resonated with the people. Some how they think the McCain will carry on the torch of the Bush admistration. I think the people should be scared of another two years of a Democrat Congressional majority, and one with the possibility of being a veto proof majority, led by Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid.

I know the Republicans deserved what they got in 2006. Many of the morally incestuous and lobbyist loving spenders were asked to leave or voted out of office for the same reasoning.

So now we look to the future, perhaps of the Republicans losing the Oval Office, and being taken over by a person who has just about all of the characteristics mention above even before being elected and who’s mantra is “Change or will it Cambiare maybe both”.

First if anything I say sounds raciest, just remember Obama is just as “White as he is Black”. 

First I want to direct you to a, Democrat and Republican Party and Presidential Candidate comparison done by the National Black Republican Association.  Take the little test.

Print and distribute our Candidate Comparison Newsletter to family, friends and associates, so they can learn the truth about Obama who does not have the character or judgment to be our president. 

http://www.trustedpartner.com/docs/library/000143/NBRA%20Newsletter.pdf

Democrat Racism has been prevalent throughout this whole campaign and it got really bazaar after a rally because Sarah Palin was wearing a white jacket. Democrat supporters said the Republicans are sending out coded messages of KKK meanings by wearing that white jacket and she might as well put on a white hood. One Obama supporter gave her the title of KKK Grand Princess.

Let’s talk about some real issues: You heard Obama talk many times about some of McCain’s campaign staff being former lobbyist. But he hired them because of their expertise in their specialized fields in both the private and public sectors. And you should also know the Senator McCain has never requested one Earmark the whole time he ahs been in Congress. Obama on the other hand has gotten 1 million dollars of Earmarked money for every day he has been active in the Senate, including voting for the bill that contained the money for the bridge to nowhere.

Another interesting tidbit is that Obama’s wife received a very large salary increase when Obama became Senator. Guess what was included in that same bill as the bridge to nowhere? 1 Million Dollars for the University of Chicago where Michelle Obama worked.

Earmarks are not illegal but they are not constitutional in the way they are introduced into already passed committee funding bills that are certain to pass a full floor vote. In most cases the earmarks, which are monies set aside for members of a particular Congressional District, were used as a bribes to get a Congressional Representative and or Senator to vote for the larger bill. Obama is the Earmark King of the Congress.

Obama was mentored by the methods of Saul Alinsky who was a Communist activist and in turn Obama supported radical activities, with millions of dollars while he was on the Boards of various foundations. Obama taught the members ACORN the radical methods of intimidating Banks to issue loans to people with no income or visible means of support because they were guaranteed by the federal government agencies, Fanny and Freddie, as well as the current Voter Fraud debacle.

The Alinsky extreme radical left belief is that class warfare is the only war worth fighting and that in order to win it the ends always justify the means, any means.                  

I am sure you have heard about the relationship with the bomber Bill Ayers by now. Just think if McCain had a friendship with somebody who bombed an abortion clinic, all hell would break lose.  

So we are near the end of this election cycle. I have sent at least a hundred faxes to Congress, twice as many E-Mails, about 25 letters to individual S.C. Congressional members on many different subjects and started this BLOG stating my views on many different subjects.

I am now going to wait for the outcome of this election and start reading some history books and novels that have been stacking up for the past year. I will wait and see if the new admistration is any better the last and then pick up the Computer and start all over again around the next Presidential election.

I’m sure I will have something to say now and again and I will send you an alert. Please send me your interesting tidbits, my e-mail will always be checked daily.

                                                Thanks for your support and encouragement,

                                                                        Jack      

 

                  

Tags: election  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Biden Palin Debate

 
Joe Biden Needs A Mental Evaluation:
 

I see why John McCain felt sorry for Joe Biden after the debate with Sarah Palin. Joe was playing typical old time politics which he was able to do in his 28 years in the Senate. A major news outlet even call him “A Master Gasbag”

He was totally lost for words or taken by surprise with Gov. Sarah Palin’s style when answering questions. As far as Sarah was concerned Biden was not even in the room and she went directly to the listeners.

Senator Biden had to come up with something to get the attention directed back to him. The approach he took was one of total stupidity and in my opinion old politics, when the people had no way to verify the truth of what politicos say without scurrying to the library and look it up in an encyclopedia.

Two of the statements the Senator made, which I could not believe, a Senator sitting for as long as he, showed such lack knowledge:

  1. After Gov. Palin said she couldn’t wait to sit in the Senate as President and work along with that body. Senator Biden said the only function a Vice President has is to vote when there was a tie.

The Constitution of the United States specifically says “The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no vote, unless they be equally divided.”

It also states that “the Senate shall chuse (chose) their Officers, and also a President pro-tempore, in the absence of the Vice President, or when he (she) shall exercise the Office of the President of the United States.”

Nowhere does the Constitution state what Senator Biden said. It points out that the Senate always has the Vice President or Pro-tempore, and in fact it is the V.P’s most important role, sitting at all times and therefore participating in the Senate’s affairs, unless there is a Senate ruling that says something different I know nothing about.

  1. The other is his dumb statement about Lebanon, when he said:

When we kicked – along with France, we kicked Hezbollah out of Lebanon, I said and Barack said, ‘Move NATO forces in there. Fill the vacuum, because if you don’t know--- if you don’t, Hezbollah will control it.’

“Now what’s happened? Hezbollah is a legitimate part of the government in the country immediately to the north of Israel.” 

 

All those years in the Senate and he has, not only has no understanding of the Constitution but of history. First Lebanon is not part of NATO and they were not attacked by any foreign country nor did they attack any foreign country.

I have no idea what he was talking about, we never forced Hezbollah from Lebanon, maybe the French did, and if so it would have had been done recently, since Obama hasn’t been in the Senate that long. As a matter of fact Hezbollah is still there filling their own vacuum.

I hope the Senator was not talking about the murderous attack of 261 Marines in Oct. 1983 leading to the withdrawal of U.S. Troops, if so, Obama was only 22 years old, and no French Troops were involved.

Could he have meant Syria’s departure from Lebanon in 2002 and 2003, again to my knowledge there were no French troops helping them with that either. They may have been part of some U.N. Peace Keeping force.

I have a feeling Senator Biden’s mouth goes faster than his brain, which again is the old politics when things didn’t get a fact check.

In that Debate he said many things that were not true or stretched some of which follows and researched by Amanda Carpenter of Townhall.com:


1. AHMEDINIJAD MEETING: Joe Biden lied when he said that Barack Obama never said that he would sit down unconditionally with Mahmoud Ahmedinijad of Iran. Barack Obama did say specifically, and Joe Biden attacked him for it during the primary.

2. OFFSHORE OIL DRILLING: Biden said, “Drill we must.” But Biden has opposed offshore drilling and even compared offshore drilling to “raping” the Outer Continental Shelf.”

3. TROOP FUNDING: Joe Biden lied when he indicated that John McCain and Barack Obama voted the same way against funding the troops in the field. John McCain opposed a bill that included a timeline with an end date, (guess he never played football) that the President of the United States had already said he would veto regardless of its passage.

4. OPPOSING CLEAN COAL: Biden says he’s always been for clean coal, but he just told a voter that he is against clean coal and any new coal plants in America and has a record of voting against clean coal and coal in the U.S. Senate.


5. HEALTH INSURANCE: Biden falsely said McCain will raise taxes on people's health insurance coverage -- they get a tax credit to offset any tax hike. Independent fact checkers have confirmed this attack is false

6. OIL TAXES: Biden falsely said Palin supported a windfall profits tax in Alaska -- she reformed the state tax and revenue system, it's not a windfall profits tax. (The State of Alaska owns all natural resources and the reform calls for a tax based on the price per barrel or per pound depending on what resource was extracted from the State and given directly to the taxpayers in the form of a check.)  


7. REGULATION: Biden falsely said McCain weakened regulation -- he actually called for more regulation on Fannie and Freddie.

8. IRAQ: When Joe Biden lied when he said that John McCain was “dead wrong on Iraq”, because Joe Biden shared the same vote to authorize the war and differed on the surge strategy where John McCain has been proven right.

I think Senator Biden should be checked for chronic cognitive and intellectual deterioration. Please Joe, have it done now because you could be the Vice President of the United States and a heartbeat away from being President.

Tags: election  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is This the Real Michelle Obama????

 

Michelle Obama
 
I don’t know the origin of this but a friend forwarded it to me. Since it is out there in the public domain and it has snippets from a valid web site Snopes.com I guess I can post it on governmentreform.townhall.com   

According to Snopes.com,  Princeton was requested to put a "restriction" on distribution of any copies of the thesis of Michelle Obama (a/k/a/ Michelle laVaughn Robinson) saying it could not be made available until November 5, 2008 but when it was published on a political website they decided they would  lift the restriction.

Here is the link to snopes.com with this information stating it is true...............

Urban Legends Reference Pages: Michelle Obama's Thesis


Subj: Thesis - Michele Obama aka Michelle LaVaughn Robinson
OBAMA'S MILITANT RACISM REVEALED

In her senior thesis at Princeton, Michele Obama, the wife of Barack Obama stated that America was a nation founded on crime and hatred". Moreover, she stated that whites in America were "ineradicably racist".   The 1985 thesis, titled "Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community" was written under her maiden name, Michelle LaVaughn Robinson.
 
Michelle Obama stated in her thesis that to "Whites at Princeton , it often seems as if, to them, she will always be Black first..." However, it was reported by a fellow black classmate, "If those "Whites at Princeton " really saw Michelle as one who always would "be Black first," it seems that she gave them that impression".
 
Most alarming is Michele Obama's use of the terms "separationist" and "integrationist" when describing the views of black people.
 
Mrs. Obama clearly identifies herself with a "separationist" view of race.
 
"By actually working with the Black lower class or within their communities as a result of their ideologies, a separationist may better understand the desperation of their situation and feel more hopeless about a resolution as opposed to an integrationist who is ignorant to their plight."
 
Obama writes that the path she chose by attending Princeton would likely lead to her "further integration and/or assimilation into a white cultural and social structure that will only allow me to remain on the periphery of society; never becoming a full participant."
 
Michele Obama clearly has a chip on her shoulder.
 
Not only does she see separate black and white societies in America , but she elevates black over white in her world.
 

Sources to benefit the black community first and foremost. "
 
What is Michelle Obama planning to do with her future resources if she's first lady that will elevate black over white in America ?
 
The following passage appears to be a call to arms for affirmative action policies that could be the hallmark of an Obama administration.
 
"Predominately white universities like Princeton are socially and academically designed to cater to the needs of the white students comprising the bulk of their enrollments."
 

 
The conclusion of her thesis is alarming.
 
Michelle Obama's poll of black alumni concludes that other black students at Princeton do not share her obsession with blackness. But rather than celebrate, she is horrified that black alumni identify with our common American culture more than they value the color of their skin. "I hoped that these findings would help me conclude that despite the high degree of identification with whites as a result of the educational and occupational path that black Princeton alumni follow, the alumni would still maintain a certain level of identification with the black community. However, these findings do not support this possibility."
 
Is it no wonder that most black alumni ignored her racist questionnaire? Only 89 students responded out of 400 who were asked for input.
 
Michelle Obama does not look into a crowd of Obama supporters and see Americans. She sees black people and white people eternally conflicted with one another.
 
The thesis provides a trove of Mrs. Obama's thoughts and world view seen through a race-based prism.
 
This is a very divisive view for a potential first lady that would do untold damage to race relations in this country in a Barack Obama administration.
 

 
Michelle Obama's intellectually refined racism should give all Americans pause for deep concern.
 
Now maybe she's changed, but she sure sounds like someone with an axe to grind with America . Will the press let Michelle get a free pass over her obviously racist comment about American whites?  I am sure that it will.
 
PS: We paid for her scholarship

Tags: election  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

South Carolina’s Women May Not be Real Women

The Democrats are so hysterical in their attacks on Governor Sarah Palin that South Carolina's Democratic Party chairwoman, Carol Fowler (wife of a national party chairman), said that “the only qualification Palin had for Vice President was that she hadn't had an abortion.”  

Maybe this is true, because it’s the only issue they, the Democrats have, and it’s for sure Carol Fowler was not implying the women should only vote based a single issue. That was her way of spinning what she said after we BLOGER types picked up on her statement.

What she really meant to imply was that only real women have abortions and only real women are Democrats an allow fetuses and infants go through what a commenter described on a Town Hall article, by Lawerence Kudlow “The Sarah Surge in Black and White.     

 Retired Geek Location: VA

Reply # 2
Date:
 Sep 13, 2008 - 8:15 AM EST

Babies Crying in Terror


”The 'Born Alive' baby who has known the closest contact with another human any human can experience - the baby has been inside another human for months.

The baby has kicked, stretched and some even suck their thumbs. Every need has been met by its human host - shelter, nourishment and safety.

Suddenly one day the baby is attacked with chemicals and poisons.

The baby enters a world bent on death and destruction towards its life.

The baby has never seen a butterfly, puppy, pretty colors or things all babies enjoy or had any human say I love you.

The baby enters the world in excruciating pain and the best trained Medical experts in the world refuse the baby any aid - in a hospital - where all facilities are available and the Doctors have sworn to protect all human life - except his.

The baby is thrown on a cold table and left to die in some hidden place.

The baby struggles to breathe because a human is born with the human will to survive. The baby cries in terror and sobs for help - that never comes - no one cares.

The innocent baby tries to live with every breath and dies alone, abandoned like a used kleenex, never having experienced anything but pain, rejection and hatred.

When the baby finally dies a death of torture and the ultimate rejection any human can receive, it is such a worthless human it doesn't even have a 'Death Certificate' issued that it ever existed.

For a few minutes, hours or days, that baby WAS an American Citizen, that should have received all of the 'Rights and Protections' under law, that any other American Citizen should have.

Michelle and Barack Obama and most Democrats, have done everything humanly possible, to make sure this baby does NOT even receive any pain medication.”

Could be the Democrats have a secret plan to save Social Security. Abort the 65 year olds.

Whatever Ms. Fowler meant by her disgusting remark, Sarah Palin is on the right side of the abortion issue, and she made her decision well before selection for VP. Her opponent, Joe Biden on the other hand, went from pro-life to pro-abortion even after voting to amend the Constitution to reverse Roe, just before he ran for President the first time in 1988 as did the Reverend Jesse Jackson. Follow the money and you will understand why.

Just to show how these Democrats shift positions based on Party Ideology and lobby money:

Dick Gephardt had co-sponsored a constitutional amendment to ban Abortion in 1977and called Roe “unjust”. He switched positions in 1996 while preparing to run for President. In 2003, his second run, while giving a speech at the National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League he blamed his pro-life past on “being raised in a working class family of Baptist faith.” This man not only is for abortion but now he is knocking the working class and the Christian, Baptist faith but also claiming he was brainwashed.

 

Tags: election  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hillary is Back, I Think

 

The opinion polls show the Barack Obama Campaign as in the tank. He is in trouble and will loose the national election unless he does something spectacular in October.

Joe Biden, at a rally in Nashua, N.H., on Wednesday 09/10/2008 in response to a statement by a supporter about how lucky they were that he was picked instead of Hillary: “Make no mistake about this”, Biden responded, "Hillary Clinton is as qualified or more qualified than I am to be vice president of the United States of America. Let’s get that straight. She’s a truly close personal friend, she is qualified to be President of the United States of America, she’s easily qualified to be Vice President of the United States of America, and quite frankly, it might have been a better pick than me. But she’s first rate, I mean that sincerely, she’s first rate, so let’s get that straight.”

So what do you think Barack and Billy Bob talked about in New York today, besides Billy campaigning for him? I think they talked about dumping Biden about the second week in October, and replacing him with Hillary.

Timing is everything in politics and if this happens in October it would not leave enough time for the McCain campaign to react or even to have a debate between Hillary and Sarah because Sarah would not have enough time to prepare for Hillary. That could be seen as a weakness for Sarah.

Tags: election  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hostages Have Been Taken

House Whip James Clyburn (D-SC) and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) are holding the country hostage by not lifting the Congressional ban on drilling the Offshore Continental Shelf (OCS).

Oil Companies have stated they can have oil flowing from the OCS within two years of lifting the ban because the Government required “path to drill” has been started.

Much to the chagrin of the Speaker of the House and her Whip, in February, 2006, Bobby Jindal, then US Rep. (R-LA), Now Governor, introduced bill HR 4761. The bill repeals all Presidential and Congressional moratoria on drilling for oil & gas in federal waters. The bill gives sole power to states to decide on drilling within 100 miles off their coasts; the federal government has control after 100 miles. States already control the first 3 miles off their coasts. HR 4761 was needed because of the Aug. 29, 2005 Hurricane Katrina destruction of the Gulf Coast.

HR 4761 passed the House of Representatives 232-187 (192 Republicans and 40 Democrats voting yes, 31 Republicans, 155 Democrats and 1 Independent voting no). Since the Presidential Ban was a Presidential Directive, President Bush did not want to repeal the Presidential Ban at that time, which in my opinion was a big, big mistake because if he had then the congressional ban would have had to be lifted.

HR 4761 was not heard of until recently when the President did lift the ban. This is what Jindal said when he heard the news which reflects the Republican strategy:

Jul 14, 2008
BATON ROUGE — Today, Governor Bobby Jindal released the following statement on President Bush's announcement that he has lifted the executive order moratorium on offshore drilling off the coast of the United States.

Governor Jindal said, "The President's announcement today is a positive signal for Louisiana and our nation. The reality is that we are in an energy crisis that has been in the works for years. We need a comprehensive, balanced energy policy from the federal government that pursues everything simultaneously, from more offshore drilling to exploring nuclear, solar and wind alternative energy sources, and increasing conservation efforts.

"This news today is especially encouraging to Louisiana as we continue to work toward being the energy technology capital of the world. We will pursue incentives and tax policies to position our state as a national leader in reducing our country's dependence on foreign sources of oil."

Bobby Jindal wants the drilling to start right now, off the coast of Louisiana, so he can start paying down the debt of rebuilding and pay their share of the levee repairs. Hold on Bobby, here comes Washington to help.

Now Pelosi and Clyburn decided drilling offshore was not the way to go and will not allow a new vote to be taken for drilling the OCS, they then proceeded to fabricate the talking points which you will hear most Democrats parrot in their statements:

  • Oil companies do not need new areas to drill. They need to focus on areas that are already opened to them. Of the 42 million acres of Federal land currently leased by oil and gas companies, only about 12 million acres are actually being drilled to produce oil and natural gas. If the Republican claims about more drilling are correct, why aren’t they demanding Big Oil explore drilling on the 30 million acres of Federal land that are already open to them but that they refuse to explore?”

Clyburn’s Web Site reflects the Pelosi’s talking points statement and reflects his views that his South Carolina Congressional District, and the country will have to live with, at least until the November elections is:

 “Democrats want to take immediate steps to increase American oil production.  That’s why we are pushing oil companies to start drilling on the more than 80 million acres of American land that is available to them right now, 68 million in the lower 48 states and another 15 to 23 million acres in Alaska.   The oil companies have the potential to produce from those acres an additional 7.8 million barrels of oil and over 60 billion cubic feet of natural gas each day.  I can think of only one reason the oil companies aren't drilling on that land -- they want demand and prices to remain high.” (This is called stupid and Pelosi’s statement is 42 million and now all of a sudden Clyburn says we have 80 million). 


”While “a box of crayons and a picture of an oil derrick” may be some people’s vision of our nation’s future energy policies, I am more inclined to take a more enlighten and long range approach. Congressional Democrats are supporting an innovations agenda that seeks to make America energy independent by 2020.  We can achieve that goal, but only if we are willing to look forward and not backwards”. (Do both stupid).

This “Kiss My Butt” statement after the visit was also parroted on June 24, Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama used this argument in a speech in Nevada: The oil companies already own drilling rights to 68 million acres of federal lands, onshore and offshore, that they haven't touched. 68 million acres that have the potential to nearly double America's total oil production. (Dumb statement and not true, now for some reason the 68 million acres includes off-shore leases which they don’t allow drilling).

The charge has been repeated by Nancy Pelosi and others in their party. However; One SC Democrat is for more drilling and clarified the talking points based on reality.

John Spratt (D-SC) press release of July 23, 2008 states: "I am for anything responsible that will bring down prices, whether it’s more drilling or less speculation. But everyone should know that we are drilling more now. The number of drilling permits grew by 360% between 1999 and 2007. Over the last four years, the government issued 28,776 permits to drill, roughly 10,000 of which remain unused. On-shore, 47.5 million acres of federal land are under lease, but only 13 million acres are producing oil or gas. Off-shore, 44 million acres are under lease, but only 10.5 million acres are in production.

"If the 68 million acres leased but not used were put in production, it would help close the gap. I voted to open 8.3 million acres to drilling in the eastern Gulf of Mexico, and more recently voted to tell the companies sitting on their leases, ‘use it or lose it.’ (We drill for oil not acres. There could be only enough oil for one rig under the 10,000 acres).

 Here is the real story of on-shore leases


According to the U.S. Department of the Interior's Mineral Management Service (MMS), there are nearly 68 million acres of federal lands (onshore and off) that are part of non-producing leases as of fiscal year 2007. This is in contrast to 25.7 million acres of leased lands that are producing oil. So, there are 68 million acres of leased land on which companies aren't extracting oil, but Obama went too far when he said oil companies "haven't touched" them. As Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Petroleum Engineer Bill Gewecke, who manages the onshore sites, told us, he "wouldn't say untouched, [I] would say undeveloped."

”That's because these leased lands that don't contain productive drilling operations likely are not lying idle as Obama implies. There are a lot of steps and procedures involved in setting up a productive oil well on leased land, both onshore and off. The Bureau of Land Management's Web site lists the regulatory hurdles that need to be cleared as part of the larger five-step life cycle of a well. The path to setting up an offshore drilling operation is even longer, as shown in a large flow chart developed by the MMS”.

And there is a lot of activity occurring on leased lands that does not qualify as "production." For 2006, the BLM reported that there were 77,257 productive holes onshore in the U.S. Beyond that, there were 6,738 applications for drilling permits, 4,708 holes in which companies had begun drilling and 3,693 where drilling had ended among onshore lands. That's a total of more than 15,000 holes that were being proposed, started or finished that do not count as "productive" holes. And that doesn't even include holes that might have been continually drilled throughout the year for exploratory reasons.

It's not known how much of that drilling is taking place on leases currently classified as "non-producing" and how much is taking place on leases that are already producing oil. BLM's Gewecke told us that the agency does not track acreage that is being developed or explored. And Andy Radford, an analyst with the American Petroleum Institute, an industry trade association, told us that the oil companies are "very secretive about announcing where they are testing, exploring and thinking of drilling because the industry is very competitive."

The Democrats are making this a political issue for the November elections and they are distorting facts, making it appear that the President is causing all this to happen. If you go to Pelosi’s Web Site you will see a graphic depicting the price of oil difference since President Bush took office. The real fact is the price made that jump only after Pelosi became Speaker of the house and Obama started running for President,  talking about taxing the oil company’s profits, taking away exploration and development subsidies, which would delay drilling and increase our dependency on the foreign oil market, and raising the capital-gains taxes.   

Of course Speculators took it to mean that the prices would rise dramatically and started buying which drove the per barrel price up. Big users such as, airlines, cruise and merchant marine lines, and other countries started buying to lock in the low price before the price went up as well. All this put undue pressure on the oil suppliers which is why we are in this mess of almost $5 per gallon gas. 

When the President lifted the Presidential ban, barrel prices dropped $9 the first day and are still going lower. This one action equated to about $.20 lower in our gas prices in SC.

If the Bush tax cuts were announced to be extended you would see the price of oil barrels drop dramatically as well.

In contrast to Clyburn, My Congressman Henry E. Brown, Jr. (SC), long-time supporter of offshore exploration and the Representative of more than 75% of the coast of South Carolina, joined fellow House Republicans at a press conference to unveil their American Energy Act.   After the event, Brown issued the following statement:

“Over the past months, I have heard an outcry from my coastal constituents as recreational and commercial fishermen, shrimpers and tour boat operators are being hurt with every increase in the price of diesel fuel. A large number of visitors that come to our beaches and historic sites travel by automobile.  The daily commute of our residents is growing more expensive.  Gas prices have become unaffordable and we must move to increase environmentally responsible domestic energy production”.

“We can no longer hope that the problem will go away.  Our country is blessed with abundant resources.  We must view our energy resources as an asset not as a liability.  We must take action immediately and vote on this legislation to allow more domestic energy to be produced by Americans, for Americans.”

Isn’t it funny that all the South Carolina Republicans and one Democrat Congressmen, our two Senators, hear their constituents and the country say DRILL NOW, any where, and only James Clyburn (D-SC) is hearing his constituents and the country saying DON’T drill the OCS AT ALL just tax the oil companies.

Clyburn’s 6th District has a population of 668,670, 60% of them are minority, with a medium income of $28,967. I don’t no for sure but I bet at least 50% his constituents are receiving government checks for their “daily bread”. These people must be screaming about not only the gas prices, but also the price of food. So the poorest part of South Carolina is taking the brunt of Clyburn’s decision not to drill for oil and being held Hostage and they are letting him get away with it.

Here’s is a man who is pulling in a salary of $165,700, telling people making $29,000, I know what’s best for you and by the way, why don’t you go to the one of the non-profit offices that I support with government money, and collect your part of the “pie”.  Sounds like “BOSS HOSS”. But really he is only Pelosi’s whipping boy doing and saying what she tells him to do.

You tell me who is doing what to whom? Follow the money is the answer to that question: Democrats are split on a plan by U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-NV., aimed at protecting them, the Democrats, not us, in the face of controversial oil drilling proposals.

A number of Senate and U.S. House of Representatives, Democrats, have sided with environmental groups, (one of the biggest contributors to the Democrats,) against Reid's plan to allow additional offshore areas to be opened to oil exploration and drilling. Reid had hoped the proposal would insulate Senate Democratic Party candidates from public anger over rising gas prices, The Hill, a Washington newspaper, reported Tuesday. (At least they know we are mad but to bad it’s all about them, not us.)

On Clyburn’s Web Site he uses a Dr. Patrick Moore, the former director of Greenpeace, as his source, for him not wanting to drill. Clyburn wants to use food and plants to produce Bio-fuel so we can become oil independent by 2020. The problem Bio-fuel cost more to produce and you need twice as much because of the BTU ratio and food crops are seasonal and there is not enough land to grow the crop source we need. Bio-fuel has a major impact on the price of food not only because of the demand for it but in getting it to market.

As I said on a previous BLOG post “Another Hoax, Energy Independence” oil, petroleum, is use in just about everything see and touch and even ware, the same way corn is used in just about everything we eat and drink. Even the nuclear power raw material, uranium, is imported from at least seven other countries. We will always have a foreign dependence on oil, ethanol, and uranium because the world’s growth rate will be between 7% and 27% by the year 2050. We better start using the word “interdependency” when we talk about energy. Independence only allows the Democrats a CYA, by pushing dates way out so you will forget about any real near term solutions.

Clyburn is just playing politics and keeping us more dependent on the 70% foreign oil we get currently and making us HOSTAGES for ever. It all boils down to the Democrats would rather let the Nation and its’ citizens go to HELL than to lose the elections.  We should explore, drill, and refine oil, mine our coal any where and any way we can, and continue to import, while finding or developing alternative energy sources. We should utilize nuclear energy to its’ fullest and yes import the uranium. We should not explore or depend on fuel sources, such as seasonal crops, which put out country’s food source at risk. It will be a big waste of time and money.

Now these two so called Lawmakers had the gall to walk out of the Capital and turn out the lights and CSPAN, go on vacation for 5 weeks, while the Republicans were still debating the oil issue on the floor. It is our money that pays for that building and we don’t want a Socialistic Dictator telling us what to do. In a Democracy we tell them what we want and 76% of us want to Drill Now, Pay Less and keep drilling, mining and nuking, until there are better solutions available.  

 It is time to vote the Socialistic big Government BUMS OUT of office. A blockade on the Capital building is needed, to not let them back in after their August recess.  Like we would notice any difference.          

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Black Suppression

 

Black Suppression:

The suppression of our black citizens by these so called black leaders, such as Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton and many black preachers, (BLOG post Can Wright be Right) has to stop.

These guys maintain control, hence obtain great wealth, by telling our black citizens that they are different from the white citizenry, they are in color only, but they, the black leaders, tell them that whitey keeps them down and from getting good jobs and they should be getting  preferential treatment over whites because of their Slave bloodline.

Black leaders have belittled black men like Bill Cosby, Thomas Sowell and many others, who drive them crazy, when they tell black audiences to stop having babies in their teens, telling black men to stay in school and get good jobs, be responsible for the kids they father. These so called black men of the cloth have even suggested the black people have to be taught differently because they learn from the opposite side of the brain.

It seems to me that black citizens who make something of themselves threaten these black leaders and their livelihood, they call them Uncle Toms and accuse them of talking down to their black brothers. There are a lot of good role models and Obama is one of them. He made something of himself and is now running for President of the United States. Just because he takes a positive position on President Bush’s “Faith Based Initiative” and wants to expand it, Jesse Jackson said Obama was talking down to the black citizens and that he wants to cut off his nuts. This is typical and they even called Obama the first white, black President. Obama didn’t come from “slave blood” but he came up through and endured the many of the same hardships as they did and these remarks are intra-racially prejudicial and these so call black leaders are the ones putting down our black citizens.

Our black citizens have to get out of the “Slave/Plantation” mindset. Nobody is going to give them money because of what happened generations ago, as they have been told. They, themselves have to get control of their lives and families. They don’t need any help from the black suppressors, they have to leave churches that preach vile and hate and integrate into white, socially uplifting, Christian churches. They have to get an education and get away from the generations depending on the government for their daily bread. Those who don’t will continue to suffer.

They are black, but they are Americans first.        

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CHANGE, CHANGE, CHANGE

 

Once again we Americans are facing a “Storm Over The Land” much like the one Carl Sandburg wrote about in is book by the same title. He was describing the lead up to the” war between the states”, or Civil War, but the cycle of events can be paralleled when describing the situation we are experiencing now.

Our storm started brewing after the resignation of President Richard Nixon for Watergate cover up. The first clue was the ending of another war which we were wining when the United States Congress pulled the funding and hundreds of thousands people were killed and mascaraed as the result. The liberal media was portraying the Vietnam action has lost and the American people bought into it demonstrating on college campuses and in the streets. Gerald Ford took over and pardoned Nixon of all crimes past, present or future.

Sound Familiar, Harry Reid comes to mind.

The economy was exploited by the liberal left as in the tank much like their doing now. Gerald Ford was not reelected, because of the Nixon pardon, and the people were ready for the “change”.

Then out of no where came a peanut farmer from Georgia with a message of “change” which seemed to resonate with the people, much like Obama’s message of “change” is perceived today. Jimmy Carter was a southern gentleman who talked about what we’ve been through, and after the trauma of Watergate, he sounded good enough to convince the masses to vote for him. His slogan was “Hi, I’m Jimmy Carter, I’m running for President”. Sitting in his rocking chair next to the fireplace, in his sweater using his southern twang, during his so called fireside chats with the American people, he actually mesmerized the majority of the population and defeated Ford handedly.

Carter, being from the south, the American people figured he was conservative enough to get us out our problems. The first bolt of lighting came when gasoline supplies became very limited and Carter decided big Government could solve this problem. He decided to implement gas rationing which was not thought out and caused the unintended consequence of extra long waiting lines at all the gas stations, tempers flared, and fighting broke out and people were being were stranded and killed all across the country. This was the first inkling that Carter was not what everybody thought, he was just whistling Dixie.

Has it turned out, Carter had no idea how to deal a sagging economy. He started throwing money at problems and spending more than was coming in and then he taxed some more. Interest rates reach and all time high of 17%, the lines at the gas stations were still long.

Then the Iran hostage crisis happened and again with no foreign policy experience every thing he did to free the hostages ended up being a great embarrassment to the United States.

As far as the American people were concern this was a crisis of major proportions, which we should have learned from. They could not buy the things they needed, the unemployment rate was at an all time high and they could not buy a home. They were riding bicycles, taking buses, or walking to work. 

Now Obama has made a case that our current economy is in the tank and the hedge-fund,     home mortgage sub-prime market, and the price of oil was all caused by the Bush administration policies. Ask him to explain just what Bush did to cause it he will say the war in Iraq. Obama also believes that we have the worst health care in the world and we have millions of poor people who can’t afford it. He believes that we should model ourselves after the European Union. He might want to pick one country to model because all 27 countries have different plans. He says the he will give everybody the opportunity to have the same health plans as congress, which is basically the French model. 

But Obama’s message of “change” which is big government rule is exactly why this country was founded. Obama does not look back into history, but this is so fundamental, that the pilgrims came to these shores to escape intrusive government and to have freedom from government mandated religions.  

The Carter administration was a disaster and the words of the cowboy actor, Ronald Reagan, “are you better off today than you were four years ago” rang clear and were enough to bring down Carter’s hope to have another try at being President. Reagan’s message was that we need less government in our lives, less taxes and a strong military to end the cold war with the USSR.

This is the message we need to hear today. We are facing a more perfect storm, the war on terror. This is not WW II, Korea or Vietnam as the Neanderthals in Congress would have us think. This is a radical religious war, one with no boundaries, terrorists with no other purpose but to kill anybody and everybody who doesn’t agree their ways or believe in radical fundamentalist Islam. As long as there is one radical Islamic alive, this war will continue.

To make our storm a more perfect one we have, Liberal Europeanism alive and well within the Congress of the United States and leading the charge is Barack Obama. This man is perfect for the job because he is totally inexperienced and he can be guided by the Neanderthals in Congress who want total control of the people through taxing as much as he does.  

 The liberal left did a good job of demonizing just about everything the Republicans have done and especially the President. They feel it is the time to trounce on the public who fell for this nonsense before and just want “change”. I would say that the people do want change, after all the big Government we have currently and, along with radical environmentalist, the Hollywood set, and labor union lobbys all who has their claws into the Democrat party. They fund and endorse the left in congress and do the same with the radical left web-sites and BLOGS. They have convinced the mainstream media both, print and television, that they should be their reporting arm. The socialist labor unions are dictating foreign policy and trade agreements. Labor unions have control of the employee employer relations, using strikes and contract restrictions that have tied the hands of our manufacturing industry so much so that they have had to send their business to other States that have right to work laws, or overseas. Labor unions have organized just about all civil service agencies and in my opinion all have become diasterous.

The liberal left has control of all levels of our public schools and colleges, have allowed  our country to be inundated with illegal immigrants and support making them dependent on our social services.

This is why this election is about “change”. The question is what kind of “change” do we want? Obama wants massive governmental control of the people and wants to build on what his socialist Democrat party has managed to get through the Congress in order get more control and reelected.

I saw a TV news segment showing a woman standing in the midst of the aftermath of the recent horrendous earthquake in China. Everything was leveled and she was the tallest object in view. She was asked by a reporter from an international news service what she was going to do next. Her answer was I will just wait here for the government to take care of me.

In my opinion, anybody who would allow themselves, to be dependent on the Government for their “daily bread” they will eventually have to submit to the demands of the Government.

This is the type of government Obama is talking about. He will get control of us utilizing massive tax increases and more government entitlements. This has already started, about 1/3 (GAO) of our population depends on the government, for their livelihood. Our school dropout rate running about 50% or more, the influx of uneducated, non-speaking illegal and legal immigrants is beginning to climb even more rapidly. If the Democrats get overriding control of congress even with out winning the Presidency you could see massive amnesty Bills, which could easily raise the government dependency to over 50%. At this point we will be living the European life style and the Democrats will have their day. They will create alphabet soup agencies just like FDR did. They will allow Union control of  all Government agencies. The rate of people working for the Government will climb to the point they will exploited with their own tax money.

Socialism and Communism come to mind. 

Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is endowed by our creator not from our Government. We are supposed to have them, and our Democracy demands, a government abides by the rules of law, is transparent and accountable to the people, a government not in control of our educational system, and one that does not prevent our military or security agencies from protecting our country. We must have a free and unbiased press and be able to freely trade with the international community.

Yes, this election is about “change” and we have clear and definitive differences between the two parties. We can either vote for a continuation of the expansion of socialism or for a Democracy as it was meant to be. We made this choice four years ago (2004) when we reelected Present Bush along with enough seats in both houses of Congress to provide a clear path to regain our democratic principals. However the Republican Party decided not to exercise their majority position, instead they decided to be like Democrats and spend like there was no tomorrow as well as get entangled with lobbyists and morality issues. They were right there was no tomorrow and in 2006 they lost control of both houses but still maintained a filibuster position in them. I am sure they learned their lesson.

We must elect people who are not looking to just keep getting elected. We need people who will focus on the Constitution of the United States. We must get Neanderthals out of our Government.   We must appoint judges who will understand what their jobs are. We can only use our vote to do it and it must be done at every level of Government, local, County, State, and school boards. We must decide how long they should be in office, such as three terms for US Senators and four terms for a US House Representative, when they complete their terms vote them out of office no matter what. The Governments will not, in most cases, a vote to allow term limits for themselves, especially at the federal level, but we, the voters, can take matters in our own hands and just vote them out when their time comes.

A John Adams Quote:

Because power corrupts, society's demands for moral authority and character increase as the importance of the position increases”.

Campaigns must also be controlled. There is no reason a US Senator or US House Representatives have to go out of their State or District soliciting campaign donations. There is no reason anybody should receive money form PACs, labor or other lobbing organizations, DNC or RNC or local special interest groups. Each elected official, except the President of the United States, should get campaign funds only from the individuals they represent.              

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Can Wright Be Right

 

I was listening to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s speech at the National Press Club and again I was struck right between my eyes when he said that “this was not about him it was about the Black Church”.

My God, I think I understand why the Black population in this country are doing what they’re doing. First the Black Population are the way they are because they think the White population looks at them through SLAVE colored glasses and therefore feel they are inferior.

Rev. Wright and other Black Preachers reinforce this premise by telling their congregations things like the White Government invented HIV to kill off Blacks and with fiery sermons that suppress and depress them. The Black Churches are aligned with the Democrat party, who by the way was not the party that pushed through the Civil Rights legislation in Congress back in LBJ’s time, who wants to keep them from getting ahead in life, keep them poor and dependent on the Government with bribes of help and money, because without them the Democrat Party would have no reason to survive.

It now appears that the Preachers in majority of Black Churches have been doing the same thing Rev. Wright has been doing for the past twenty years or more. Obama said that “the most segregated hour of American life occurs on Sunday morning”. The Black Radical Christian movement has been happening in Black Churches, not under our noses but right in front of us and it is sure working which is proven by some of the glaring depressing statistics that we see and hear about every day and have become an acceptable way of life.

                        Black teenage pregnancies                              138.8 per 1,000

                        Black fatherless homes                                   57%

                        Black high school dropouts                            60% Among Black Males

                        Black jail population / violent crimes              52%                                          

A high level of Black male dropouts is significant because they are the ones who would be working making higher wages. Blacks have problems with speaking English, job skills, segregation, transportation, child care, and the effects of incarceration. The Blacks tend to have generations of children, with one parent and no child support, well, except for the government.

All these factors make for low wage jobs, high unemployment and certainly less viable for Black women.

On top of all this the Black preachers are telling their congregations that their kids can not be taught the same way as white kids and they should demand a new way of teaching. They should fight for “Racial Norming test scores”. In other words make white kids as stupid as the Black kids. I guess they learn from a different side of the brain or something, B.S.

I think they are stupid because that is what they are told by the more successful Blacks, in fact didn’t Obama’s wife tell Black college students not to aim for the high paying corporate jobs and help the poor Blacks instead. Now college graduates will be collecting Government checks. The poor Blacks don’t employ anyone. The Democrats just keep on giving. The Democrats encourage Blacks to remain in poverty and to be dependent on the Government. They will receive handouts as long as the see themselves as victims. 

The National Black Republican Association’s Frances Rice describes the Democrat Party as the architect of modern-day racism.  Little known by many today is the fact that it was Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois, not Democrat President Lyndon Johnson, who pushed through the civil rights laws of the 1960’s.  In fact, Dirksen was key to the passage of civil rights legislation in 1957, 1960, 1964, 1965 and 1968.  Dirksen wrote the language for the 1965 Voting Rights Act.  Dirksen also crafted the language for the Civil Rights Act of 1968 which prohibited discrimination in housing.

Rice continues by saying what is always omitted from discussions today are significant facts about the struggle to pass the landmark 1964 Civil Rights Act.  The law guaranteed equal access to public facilities and banned racial discrimination by any entity receiving federal government financing.  The law was an update of Republican Charles Sumner's 1875 Civil Rights Act which had been stuck down by the Democrat-controlled US Supreme Court in 1883.

The chief opponents of the 1964 Civil Rights Act were Democrat Senators Sam Ervin, Albert Gore, Sr. and Robert Byrd.  Senator Byrd, a former member of the Ku Klux Klan, filibustered against the bill for 14 straight hours before the final vote.  Former Presidential candidate Richard Nixon lobbied hard for the passage of the bill.  When the bill finally came up for a vote, the House of Representatives passed the bill by 289 to 124.  80% of Republicans in the House of Representatives voted yes, and only 63% of Democrats voted yes.  The Senate vote was 73 to 27, with 21 Democrats in the Senate voting no, and only 6 Republicans voting no.

Wright’s statements such as,” no black man will ever be considered for president, no black woman can ever be considered for anything outside what she can give with her body”. We, the U.S.A., believe in importing drugs, and the exporting of guns.  Wright still keeps on giving, the U.S. believes in white supremacy and black inferiority, racism is how this country was founded and how it is still being run.         

If Wright is right and his brand of garbage is being preached in the thousands of Black churches across this country it is amazing we are not experiencing Black Watts type riots taking place every Sunday afternoon.

On the back cover of the book “SCAM” by Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, two black educated men, who must have survived Black Radical Christianity, Walter E Williams, Professor of economics at George Mason University and Dr. Earl Ofari Hutchinson, nationally syndicated columnist, both agree that Black politicians and civil-rights deliver one disaster after another for Black Americans, and the self appointed so-called Black leaders have made long and lucrative careers posing as the mouthpieces for  the Black.

Jesse Jackson, Louis Farrakhan, Al Sharpton, and others, are lying about why Blacks are in trouble. These so-called leaders profit by creating hatred and animosity between races just as Jeremiah Wright is doing. All of them can twist and turn verses in the Bible or

Koran to assure their listeners, these are God’s words.  

I would like to know how these Preachers end up with their million dollar homes in upscale, white neighborhoods, and million dollar pensions when the congregations are still treated as dumb, stupid and poor. When are the Blacks going to throw these idiots under the bus, as Obama has almost tried, and when are they going to learn that the Democrat Party is getting massive amounts of money from Black organizations with the intention of giving nothing but promises to the Blacks which learn and understand from the wrong side of the brain. When are the Blacks going to learn that the Republican Party empowers them and does not treat them as Slaves? Makes you wonder who the Racists are??

In my humble opinion, if educated Blacks make something of themselves in a white world such as, Condi Rice, Clarence Thomas, Colin Powell, and many others, that they become automatically white. The Rev. Wright even said he would come after Obama if he happened to become President. Blacks are supposed to be educated in Black schools and work as poor Blacks most of the time off the books.

There is a Black organization with in the congress of the United States called the Congressional Black Caucus, for what reason I don’t know, but from its name it must be a front for racial socialism. I don’t understand why this is allowed, this is not mentioned in our Constitution. The only reason I see is that they must meet to have somebody interpret what happened during the day’s congressional sessions, since they learn from a different part of the brain than the white Congress. Why are we, the taxpayers supporting it? The Black Caucus is just another way of Blacks trying to separate the Black voters from the whites because, in their minds, the Blacks are too stupid to think for themselves and they must be persuaded to vote Democrat so the Government will keep on giving.

The Caucus membership is officially non-partisan, but in practice it has been closely identified with the Democratic Party, and tends to function as a lobbying group within the wider Democratic Party. Only four black Republicans have been elected to Congress since the Caucus was founded: Senator Edward W. Brooke of Massachusetts, who had a long running affair with the famous Barbara Walters, Representative Gary Franks of Connecticut, Delegate Melvin H. Evans of the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Representative J. C. Watts of Oklahoma, who became the first black member of Congress elected not to join the group because of its closely Democratic affiliation and goals.

Representative Watts said of his refusal to join the caucus, "...they said that I had sold out and I am an Uncle Tom. And I said well, they deserve to have that view. But I have my thoughts. And I think they're race-hustling poverty pimps." White members of Congress have never been welcomed into the caucus.

I guess the Rev. Wright is right again, the Black churches along with their Preachers are promoting Black congregations to remain dumb, stupid and segregated. They now have their own holiday called Kwanzaa. History.Com explains Kwanzaa as a non-religious African American holiday which celebrates family, community and culture. It was created in 1966 after the Watts riots. Some people say Kwanzaa is just another movement by educated Blacks to control the non-educated and keep them dependent on government handouts.

There also was an attempt by Black educators to have their own official language “Ebonics” which isa portmanteau of "ebony" and "phonics", was originally intended and sometimes used for the language of all people of African ancestry, it was shot down, I believe in California, another attempt to keep the un-educated Blacks down on the farm.

Wright has retired but another Pastor, Otis Moss III, who was the assistant pastor under Wright, is taking over. Is this guy as bad as Wright? There are indications that he may be.

Ronald Kessler, of News Max, who has been on the trail of Obama and Wright, says this guy Moss, known as the "hip-hop pastor," while he has not expressed hatred of America and of whites, as Wright did, in a sermon on YouTube, Moss derides middle-class America for not accepting the “prophetic brilliance” of thugs, such as Tupac Shakur a “gangsta” rap star with a fairly violent criminal record before being fatally shot in 1996.  

Kessler, said referring to these thugs, Moss says sardonically, “There are times when our prejudice keeps us from hearing ghetto prophets, who preach a brand of thug theology which keeps us from hearing the truth from their lips because of their coarse language and ragged subject-verb agreement.”

Hang on to your hats we may be in for a “gangsta” rap President who will speak “Ebonics”.
Tags: election  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hillary and Obama Having "Brain Farts"

 

Hillary & Obama have got to be having “Brain Farts”.

Hillary announced while campaigning in Pennsylvania she is proposing billions of dollars a year to keep jobs from being shipped abroad. Get a load of this, Hillary proposes the elimination of tax breaks for companies that move jobs to other countries and use the savings to provide $7 billion a year in tax incentives to persuade companies to "in-source" (a new Democrat word) jobs in the United States, according to “StarTibune.com”. 

Pennsylvania has suffered the loss of manufacturing jobs in recent years and have yet to transition to new industries and other ways of expanding their economies.

This is what I call “rob Peter to pay Paul”. Clinton's plan would offer new tax benefits for research and job development. It would also create "innovation and research clusters" and provide $500 million annually in investments to encourage the creation of high-wage jobs in clean energy.

Obama seems confident that an increase in capital gains rates will do much to help an economy in crisis:

"What it will also do is first of all help out the federal Treasury, which is running a credit card up with the bank of China and other countries,” said Obama. "What it will also do, I think, is allow us to make investments in basic scientific research, in infrastructure, in broadband lines, in green energy and will allow us to give some relief to middle class and working class families who have been driving this economy as consumers but have been doing it through credit cards and home equity loans. They're not going to be able to do that.”

Hillary and Obama are having “Brain Farts”. Hillary is eliminating tax breaks from companies that move jobs offshore. What is the reason they are doing this? To avoid paying corporation taxes. So what do you think these companies will do to avoid paying the added taxes? They will establish their headquarters in countries that don’t have corporate taxes and then everybody in the company will either relocate or lose their jobs. She will have to appropriate the $500 million annually anyway because she is beholding to the big labor unions, but now guess who will pay the bill? The same people she said she would help.  As far as Pennsylvania is concerned, R & D jobs will not replace the ‘Nut & Bolt” jobs lost in that state.

 Her “in-sourcing” really means she will import H1-B Aliens, which are highly educated people from India and other low paying countries and of course they will not go back.        

Obama is raising the capital gains tax at least to 28% from 15% to provide relief to middle class and working class families. First of all, middle class and working class families are the same. Guess what they are the biggest individual holders and traders of stock and they will be hurt the most. What do you think these poor little individual stock holders will do? I know what I will do. I will sell off my stock holdings at the end of the year and get right into the bond market.  Don’t the working middle class own Real Estate? The devil is in the detail on this one.

The big guys will sell off at the end of the year and buy and hold stocks for long term investment and also get into bonds until after the new President gets installed. After a very big sell off and the bottom falls out of the market the individual and big guy bond holders will start buying stock for holding long term and wait four years for a Republican to get back in the White House.

Hillary and Obama are making you think the tax burden got lighter for the rich and heavier for the poor. But the Congressional Budget Office numbers show. The top 1 percent of earners went from paying 27.7 percent of the tax burden to 31.2 percent -- an increase of 12.6 percent. The bottom 20 percent, meanwhile, saw its share of the tax burden go from 9.1 percent to 4.3 percent.  It was actually cut in half, and then some: (This is being reported by Rebecca Haglin on townhall.com)

These two socialist’s, Hillary and Obama have proposed nothing that will make our life better. All of their “Brain Farted” proposals so far, the government will lose money and the working middle class will just be worse off.

Just about all the States that are in trouble, for loss of jobs and in money trouble, are States that are run by Democrats who are influenced by big labor unions. Indiana was run for 16 years by the Democrats and when the Republican Mitch Daniels took over he found the treasury empty. Daniels is up for reelection and the Democrat running against him wants to reinstate everything he has cut which still leaves the State in a multimillion dollar deficit. Most of the manufacturing in Indiana is labor union run.

On her latest campaign of lies tour, she citied she would prevent the off shoring of defense-related production, citing an Indiana company that once produced sophisticated magnets for the Pentagon's precision-guided missiles. The Magnequench factory (originally known as UGIMAG) was sold in August 2000(Bill Clinton was still President) to a consortium that included Chinese interests. In 2001, it was announced the plant would be shut down. In 2003, the company, Magnequench, shuttered its last Indiana factory and shifted operations to China. How many other plants did this company have and when were they shuttered? Here is some history about Magnequench and maybe you will get the real story:    

In 1995, Magnequench was purchased from GM by Sextant Group, an investment company headed by Archibald Cox, Jr., the son of the Watergate prosecutor. After the takeover, Cox was named CEO. What few knew at the time was that Sextant was largely a front for two Chinese companies, San Huan New Material and the China National Non-Ferrous Metals Import and Export Corporation. Both of these companies have close ties to the Chinese government. Indeed, the ties were so intimate that the heads of both companies were in-laws of the late Chinese premier Deng Xiaopeng. Who was the President and Governor in 1995?

Three years later Cox shut down the Anderson Indiana plant and shipped its assembly line to China. (Where was Hillary then?) Now Cox is presiding over the closure of Magnequench last factory in the US, the Valparaiso, Indiana plant that manufactures the magnets for the JDAM bomb. Most of the workers have already been fired. Who was President and U.S. Senator in 1998?

Archie Cox and his company are committing a criminal act," says Mike O'Brien, an organizer with the UAW in Indiana. "He's a traitor to his country." Did he say any thing when the Anderson plant was closed? NO because he would have had to blame the Clinton which he and his union supported.

It's clear that Cox and Sextant were acting as a front for some unsavory interests. For example, only months prior to the takeover of Magnequench, San Huan New Materials was cited by US International Trade Commission for patent infringement and business espionage. The company was fined $1.5 million. Foreign investment in American high-tech and defense companies is regulated by the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States (CFIUS). It is unlikely that CFIUS would have approved San Huan's purchase of Magnequench had it not been for the cover provided by Cox and his Sextant Group. I guess Billy Bob was sitting on the oval office desk with Monica in the chair when all this was going down. Pardon the pun.

The answer to the questions above are, Billy Bob Clinton, Pres and Evan Bayh, Gov. in 1995 and in 1998 it was Billy Bob Clinton, Pres and Evan Bayh, U.S. Senator. The two were partners in crime, accepting money from the Labor Unions.

Hillary had another “Brain Fart” because she knows full well that this screw-up took place under her Husband’s watch and she is now trying to deflect the blame on to President Bush. The fact also is that the only source of the magnet material is now in China, it made sense to move the manufacturing closer to the source. The Magnequench decision could not be reversed by the Bush Administration because China already owned the company.

What about Hillary trying to duct the snipers bullets, another “Brain Fart”.

What about Obama’s troop pullout policy which was just putdown by a guy he hired to prove his strategy was good, another “Brain Fart”.     

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

RACEISM OR RADICALISM

 

Believe it or Not:

I believe we are experiencing something we never knew existed before.

It took a black candidate running for President of the United States of America to bring this out in the open. It is what I call “Radical Christianity” and they have a self ordained Prophet by the name of “Jeremiah”, and many followers.

If you listen the Prophet Jeremiah preach in his church about how Black Americans should hate America has he implies when he hollers ‘GOD damn America or HIV was invented by Whites to kill Blacks and that America deserves we got on 9/11 is really nothing more that “Radical Islam with their Prophet named “Muhammed” or in the United States maybe the Prophet’s name is “Farrakhan” and “Radical Clerics” preaching killing infidels and Americans in their Mosques.

What scares me is when the preachers who, defend this so called “Prophetic” activity, they say this sort of thing has been going on for many, many years.

We white people have heard the Black Preachers on TV preach to their congregations “there is no need to work, the Government will send you checks, because it owes you money from when your ancestors were slaves working for nothing. Don’t forget your beloved preacher when those checks come”.

Also during this campaign we learned that if a so-called mixed race person’s parent and their parents (grandparents) are white then he was born from “WHITE TRASK” which makes him TRASH.

I watched an interview on TV with a Black PHD Professor saying that this is the way black people express their love for Christ. Well I hope for the country’s sake that Christ is Black because, the certainty is, White people and I among them, assume a White Christ and are betting he doesn’t understand this behavior.

I think the Black population in our jails and seeing 4 and 5 generations of unwed Black Females on the streets of which all are under the age of forty with no Males, should be no surprise. It should also be no surprise that they are all waiting for Governments checks.

I see very little difference, if any, between the rants of Radical Christianity like the Prophet “Jeremiah” and Radical Islam with their Prophetic preaching. They are both very destructive.  

             

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I Told You So!

 

My BLOG post of January 26, 2008, just hours before the polls closed on the South Carolina Democrat primary, titled “The Clinton’s Strategy and Tactics” put forth the tactics that the “Clinton Machine” would use in defeating Obama.

Bill Clinton, knowing that Hillary had no chance of winning the South Carolina primary started to interject the Black vs. White tactic with some very harsh words essentially laying the ground work for defining Obama as the “Black” candidate for the “Blacks, where as Hillary is the candidate for all the people. His words implied that if Obama was the Democrat nominee he would pick off the “Black” vote and if he got elected he would pander to the needs of the “Black”.

Bill took to the road ahead of Hillary and put this theory to the test with the goal of not making Hillary look like “The Bad Gal”, and it has proven very successful thus far. Obama has gotten 90% of the “Black” vote across all the States primaries and caucuses.

But Hillary has not just Billy Bob working for her but at least three radical left Dot Com companies as well as Geraldine Ferraro. This is part of the strategy that I mention on the January 26, BLOG post. One of the steps when picking the target is to use any means possible, to reach your goal, including throwing your friends under the bus when they served your purpose. This is what they did with Ferraro and others in her campaign and many times during Bill’s Presidency. You know what they say it’s always easier to say you’re sorry when someone else did the dirty deed. Hillary, in private, told Billy Bob to cool it while saying in public that “Bill is Bill”.

There is no doubt in my mine, and many others, how sermons, preached by Obama’s Pastor, got on “U-TUBE” at just the right time or who put the picture of Obama on the Net in native dress. This is only the start, believe me, the “Clinton Machine” will soon destroy Obama not because he is Black, although that’s what they will use to do it, but because he is winning as of now.          

Tags: election  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »